From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F13C433FE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EF861A81 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233650AbhKSAga (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:36:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40924 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233645AbhKSAg3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:36:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CFCC06173E for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:33:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id u11so6777974plf.3 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:33:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UkcM1rTecmJ25KsUoXFTZKIn9eyzcYLgTJdNQlzShK8=; b=nNONCxvj70orXmFEPPlUSDO3mt6Wtl927JrNDbPxGbq3nLI7dP4aUomf4ikpaAWno1 E5tZ/1qd+TfTbpG3LKaqN3/Q005utHPSi5xYtFL481zC+BGznNHJIpSCAxcReahqhnBX tFfQGDSsOCTvTJzQl80RCaDg+QR/KouVZUOeNuIg3nccU7JjgzDrTQl0U/n93pd4wC6E XxzpObxnLdf9bS/XDIelOHQBYzAx3azq/h3nJh7vThyhUxl3MelJlTwXx+EMRGwpO58E rGWhe2M3G001XQnWRJJksjXDSpugEK1Sh26xTl+BRMz9DQbU6lo6LNZyYUXrfqgk+4MQ y+Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UkcM1rTecmJ25KsUoXFTZKIn9eyzcYLgTJdNQlzShK8=; b=yGcplQk3wY8rZm8lKhdZZYqW0Q9rZHJlPQ4Q+DPcr46socQdmjLAZB52oVkINiVSJF sEzxeatUw6QpTmHL81gHax1GLIAZ9ZKYN7OR1z2rRSUkaQzn62luHu6nvREHjFiFSZfd pPNYov5AuMUv/9DLNN/888fF8fnhTx3vfkHzDf22oN2yztAfxwxKDQ0Lla6h2bQMmEy0 MsV0Ao8uKwPPRCry/VdEkHix4Iij+SMrgmbyleayeAF0L3Gd1+NMo8aALQLtwYHFbY22 A2I5qmZZPu/HdoQxHZkT+ZOn+PsMpQNnPf2KJlq2jwGyZ3EOzp41wm3/JZ6NrgzCausy 8A7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GRyQh5Uf5RywgtoMTqL5I1JHuNWrleLEZ2nNIgEGH98kj0I5P fInYsQoFV1d670Il39a8Jvhqig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7HLZK7jaTa73RkUrjpdUhNrR+ZBGuDJ1erNCEFL+MslOqX3V7V8oW+JO6oH3Lu4UeiweKvA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a01:: with SMTP id kk1mr15807790pjb.7.1637282008706; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from leoy-ThinkPad-X240s ([66.23.193.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k8sm574903pgj.94.2021.11.18.16.33.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:33:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:33:17 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , John Garry , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf cs-etm: Pass -1 as pid value for machine__set_current_tid() Message-ID: <20211119003317.GD69886@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> References: <20211113143540.53957-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20211118171412.GB2530497@p14s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211118171412.GB2530497@p14s> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Hi Mathieu, On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:14:12AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good morning Leo, > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 10:35:40PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > Currently, cs-etm passes the tid value for both tid and pid parameters > > when calling machine__set_current_tid(), this can lead to confusion for > > thread handling. E.g. we arbitrarily pass the same value for pid and > > tid, perf tool will be misled to consider it is a main thread (see > > thread__main_thread()). > > > > On the other hand, Perf tool only can retrieve tid from Arm CoreSight > > context packet, and we have no chance to know pid (it maps to kernel's > > task_struct::tgid) from hardware tracing data. For this reason, this > > patch passes -1 as pid for function machine__set_current_tid(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan > > --- > > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c > > index f323adb1af85..eed1a5930072 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c > > @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ int cs_etm__etmq_set_tid(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > > if (cs_etm__get_cpu(trace_chan_id, &cpu) < 0) > > return err; > > > > - err = machine__set_current_tid(etm->machine, cpu, tid, tid); > > + err = machine__set_current_tid(etm->machine, cpu, -1, tid); > > I remember wondering about what to do with the pid parameter when I wrote this > patch... > > Do you have a before-and-after snapshot you can add to the changelog? I tried to capture log but I didn't observe the difference introduced by this patch, this might because I didn't per-process mode for multi-threading case. I will try more case for this. > I also think it will require a "Fixes" tag. In your next revision please CC James > since you guys are working in that area nowadays. Will do. And will Cc James and German in next spin. Thanks for review and suggestion. Leo