linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	acme@kernel.org, irogers@google.com
Cc: svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix perf test 7 Simple expression parser on s390
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 10:03:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211124090343.9436-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Commit fdf1e29b6118 ("perf expr: Add metric literals for topology.")
fails on s390:
 # ./perf test -Fv 7
   ...
 # FAILED tests/expr.c:173 #num_dies >= #num_packages
   ---- end ----
   Simple expression parser: FAILED!
 #

Investigating this issue leads to these functions:
 build_cpu_topology()
   +--> has_die_topology(void)
        {
           struct utsname uts;

           if (uname(&uts) < 0)
                  return false;
           if (strncmp(uts.machine, "x86_64", 6))
                  return false;
           ....
        }

which always returns false on s390. The caller build_cpu_topology()
checks has_die_topology() return value. On false the
the struct cpu_topology::die_cpu_list is not contructed and has zero
entries. This leads to the failing comparison: #num_dies >= #num_packages.
s390 of course has a positive number of packages.

Fix this by adding s390 architecture to support CPU die list.

Output after:
 # ./perf test -Fv 7
  7: Simple expression parser                                        :
  --- start ---
  division by zero
  syntax error
  ---- end ----
  Simple expression parser: Ok
 #
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Fixes: fdf1e29b6118 ("perf expr: Add metric literals for topology.")

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/cputopo.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c b/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c
index 51b429c86f98..aad7a9e6e31b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c
@@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ static bool has_die_topology(void)
 	if (uname(&uts) < 0)
 		return false;
 
-	if (strncmp(uts.machine, "x86_64", 6))
+	if (strncmp(uts.machine, "x86_64", 6) &&
+	    strncmp(uts.machine, "s390x", 5))
 		return false;
 
 	scnprintf(filename, MAXPATHLEN, DIE_CPUS_FMT,
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-24  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24  9:03 Thomas Richter [this message]
2021-11-24 15:41 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix perf test 7 Simple expression parser on s390 Ian Rogers
2021-11-25  1:06   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-14 14:51   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211124090343.9436-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).