From: Dongli Si <kvmx86@gmail.com>
To: liam.merwick@oracle.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
joerg.roedel@amd.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kim.phillips@amd.com,
kvmx86@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mingo@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/x86/amd: Don't touch the Host-only bit inside the guest hypervisor
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:19:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220314041930.1487087-1-sidongli1997@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3508496a-59ea-2004-2917-2ffe712cc187@oracle.com>
On 11/03/2022 22:25, Liam Merwick wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 18:34, Dongli Si wrote:
> > From: Dongli Si <sidongli1997@gmail.com>
> >
> > With nested virtualization, when the guest hypervisor runs a nested guest
> > and if uses "perf record" in an AMD Milan guest hypervisor, the guest
> > hypervisor dmesg will reports the following warning message:
>
> I think it might be clearer with L0/L1/L2 terminology. Maybe something
> like the following?
>
> "With nested virtualization on AMD Milan, if "perf record" is run in an
> L1 hypervisor with an L2 guest, the following warning is emitted in
> the L1 guest."
>
>
> >
> > [] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc0010200 (tried to write 0x0000020000510076)
> > at rIP: 0xffffffff81003a50 (x86_pmu_enable_all+0x60/0x100)
> > [] Call Trace:
> > [] <IRQ>
> > [] ? x86_pmu_enable+0x146/0x300
> > [] __perf_install_in_context+0x150/0x170
> >
> > The AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit is defined and used on the host, while
> > the guest hypervisor performance monitor unit should avoid such use.
>
> "The AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY bit is defined and used on the host (L0),
> while the L1 hypervisor Performance Monitor Unit should avoid such use."
>
>
>
> >
> > Fixes: 1018faa6cf23 ("perf/x86/kvm: Fix Host-Only/Guest-Only counting with SVM disabled")
> > Signed-off-by: Dongli Si <sidongli1997@gmail.com>
>
> Tested-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
Hi Liam, I will improve the description based on your suggestion
and resend the patch, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 18:34 [PATCH v2] perf/x86/amd: Don't touch the Host-only bit inside the guest hypervisor Dongli Si
2022-03-11 22:25 ` Liam Merwick
2022-03-14 4:19 ` Dongli Si [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220314041930.1487087-1-sidongli1997@gmail.com \
--to=kvmx86@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).