From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<jolsa@redhat.com>, <jthierry@redhat.com>,
<keescook@chromium.org>, <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<masahiroy@kernel.org>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<maz@kernel.org>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<namhyung@kernel.org>, <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
<sumit.garg@linaro.org>, <wangqing@vivo.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<yj.chiang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: add hw_nmi_get_sample_period for preparation of lockup detector
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:13:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427161340.8518-6-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427161340.8518-1-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Set safe maximum CPU frequency to 5 GHz in case a particular platform
doesn't implement cpufreq driver.
Although, architecture doesn't put any restrictions on
maximum frequency but 5 GHz seems to be safe maximum given the available
Arm CPUs in the market which are clocked much less than 5 GHz.
On the other hand, we can't make it much higher as it would lead to
a large hard-lockup detection timeout on parts which are running
slower (eg. 1GHz on Developerbox) and doesn't possess a cpufreq driver.
Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Co-developed-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_hld.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 986837d7ec82..cd238b92d6d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS) += module-plts.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += perf_regs.o perf_callchain.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS) += perf_event.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF) += watchdog_hld.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_PM) += sleep.o suspend.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE) += cpuidle.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_hld.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..de43318e4dd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+
+/*
+ * Safe maximum CPU frequency in case a particular platform doesn't implement
+ * cpufreq driver. Although, architecture doesn't put any restrictions on
+ * maximum frequency but 5 GHz seems to be safe maximum given the available
+ * Arm CPUs in the market which are clocked much less than 5 GHz. On the other
+ * hand, we can't make it much higher as it would lead to a large hard-lockup
+ * detection timeout on parts which are running slower (eg. 1GHz on
+ * Developerbox) and doesn't possess a cpufreq driver.
+ */
+#define SAFE_MAX_CPU_FREQ 5000000000UL // 5 GHz
+u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ unsigned long max_cpu_freq;
+
+ max_cpu_freq = cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(cpu) * 1000UL;
+ if (!max_cpu_freq)
+ max_cpu_freq = SAFE_MAX_CPU_FREQ;
+
+ return (u64)max_cpu_freq * watchdog_thresh;
+}
+
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 16:13 [PATCH v4 0/6] Support hld delayed init based on Pseudo-NMI for arm64 Lecopzer Chen
2022-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] kernel/watchdog: remove WATCHDOG_DEFAULT Lecopzer Chen
2022-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] kernel/watchdog: change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void Lecopzer Chen
2022-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] kernel/watchdog_hld: Ensure CPU-bound context when creating hardlockup detector event Lecopzer Chen
2022-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] kernel/watchdog: Adapt the watchdog_hld interface for async model Lecopzer Chen
2022-05-20 9:38 ` Petr Mladek
2022-05-26 9:39 ` Lecopzer Chen
2022-04-27 16:13 ` Lecopzer Chen [this message]
2022-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: Enable perf events based hard lockup detector Lecopzer Chen
2022-05-20 9:47 ` Petr Mladek
2022-05-26 9:35 ` Lecopzer Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427161340.8518-6-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--to=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yj.chiang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).