linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	acme@kernel.org
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:09:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615130901.1151397-2-german.gomez@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615130901.1151397-1-german.gomez@arm.com>

Add a self test for branch stack sampling, to check that we get the
expected branch types, and filters behave as expected.

Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/main.h | 16 +++++
 tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/test.c | 24 +++++++
 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh    | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/main.h
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/test.c
 create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/main.h b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/main.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..94d2665ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/main.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define BENCH_RUNS 99999
+
+void bench(void);
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	int cnt = 0;
+
+	while (1) {
+		if ((cnt++) > BENCH_RUNS)
+			break;
+		bench();		/* call */
+	}				/* branch (uncond) */
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/test.c b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8a2308901
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/brstack/test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "main.h"
+
+int cnt;
+
+void bar(void)
+{
+}				/* return */
+
+void foo(void)
+{
+	bar();			/* call */
+}				/* return */
+
+void bench(void)
+{
+	void (*foo_ind)(void) = foo;
+
+	if ((cnt++) % 3)	/* branch (cond) */
+		foo();		/* call */
+
+	bar();			/* call */
+	foo_ind();		/* call (ind) */
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..2b1a1b20a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Check branch stack sampling
+
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2022
+
+set -e
+
+# we need a C compiler to build the test programs
+# so bail if none is found
+if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then
+	echo "failed: no compiler, install gcc"
+	exit 2
+fi
+
+# skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
+perf record -b -o- -- true > /dev/null || exit 2
+
+TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d /tmp/__perf_test.program.XXXXX)
+
+cleanup() {
+	rm -rf $TMPDIR
+}
+
+trap cleanup exit term int
+
+test_user_branches() {
+	echo
+	echo "Testing user branch stack sampling"
+	echo
+
+	cc -fno-inline -g "$(dirname $0)/lib/brstack/test.c" -o $TMPDIR/a.out
+
+	perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data -q --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- $TMPDIR/a.out
+	perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script
+
+	# example of branch entries:
+	# 	foo+0x14/bar+0x40/P/-/-/0/CALL
+
+	set -x
+	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^foo\+[^ ]*/bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^bar\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/RET$"		$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^foo\+[^ ]*/bench\+[^ ]*/RET$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/bench\+[^ ]*/COND$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	egrep -m1 "^main\+[^ ]*/main\+[^ ]*/UNCOND$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
+	set +x
+
+	# some branch types are still not being tested:
+	# IND COND_CALL COND_RET SYSCALL SYSRET IRQ SERROR NO_TX
+}
+
+test_filter() {
+	local filter=$1
+	local expect=$2
+
+	echo
+	echo "Testing branch stack filtering permutation ($filter,$expect)"
+	echo
+
+	cc -fno-inline -g "$(dirname $0)/lib/brstack/test.c" -o $TMPDIR/a.out
+
+	perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data -q --branch-filter $filter,save_type,u -- $TMPDIR/a.out
+	perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstack | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script
+
+	# fail if we find any branch type that doesn't match any of the expected ones
+	# also consider UNKNOWN branch types (-)
+	if egrep -vm1 "^[^ ]*/($expect|-|( *))$" $TMPDIR/perf.script; then
+		return 1
+	fi
+}
+
+test_user_branches
+
+# first argument <arg0> is the argument passed to "--branch-stack <arg0>,save_type,u"
+# second argument are the expected branch types for the given filter
+test_filter "any_call"	"CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|FAULT_DATA|FAULT_INST"
+test_filter "call"	"CALL|SYSCALL"
+test_filter "cond"	"COND"
+test_filter "any_ret"	"RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET"
+
+test_filter "call,cond"		"CALL|SYSCALL|COND"
+test_filter "any_call,cond"		"CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|IRQ|FAULT_DATA|FAULT_INST|SYSCALL|COND"
+test_filter "cond,any_call,any_ret"	"COND|CALL|IND_CALL|COND_CALL|SYSCALL|IRQ|FAULT_DATA|FAULT_INST|RET|COND_RET|SYSRET|ERET"
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 13:09 [PATCH 0/1] perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling German Gomez
2022-06-15 13:09 ` German Gomez [this message]
2022-06-27 16:38   ` [PATCH] " Ian Rogers
2022-06-27 16:45     ` German Gomez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615130901.1151397-2-german.gomez@arm.com \
    --to=german.gomez@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).