From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A503C04A68 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229794AbiG0HMU (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 03:12:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230081AbiG0HMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 03:12:19 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52423DBEB; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 26R6lVbp025480; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=jJT+gJ4f4CJHrMEHQIlyKWPRBz6eVbgfdj6JbgHJY6g=; b=bl5SfATS84EfewHgahXa/vujRig4WchqdXT7EYxeT0WGq0TX/ctzJP8U4MvQlcyLKO9G mcRWuGO6rUtUHnAgsa7tn+HhFm7sJjClQwhcipXfkspVO2yILV99yZwzq6QEFdZUdXMv QIFEYm5k9wTYoug1CyHCarSDsctmkVPj8W/8lWknJoICwEM4Vswk5+0KJH7KR1td1BeD iBX3V9vBPgI9kdK6UWCGzoq/JC9KH5mQiMj0YysFQoF8Yfb0Lae3whDscMgRMp3Wl8Hb sOEeZqcapMbkhdc7KDrDvIuDFXSkTXE3pfTQN9FXQR8HND76+BcqWzD848YlZydr7Kkw 8A== Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hk0dggmkx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 26R76M1A013901; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:10 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3hg94ebjdy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:10 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 26R7C7ie24904030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:07 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B134203F; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F62242042; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:12:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Thomas Richter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, german.gomez@arm.com Cc: svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, Thomas Richter Subject: [PATCH] perf/tests: Fix test case 95 Check branch stack sampling on s390 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:11:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20220727071159.173360-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: qCj-x0O97a5KzEyEU7wyY_SwIgRFWUe_ X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: qCj-x0O97a5KzEyEU7wyY_SwIgRFWUe_ X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-07-26_07,2022-07-26_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2206140000 definitions=main-2207270025 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On linux-next tree perf test 95 was added recently. s390 does not support branch sampling at all. Therefore omit this test on s390 platform. Output before: # ./perf test -Fv 95 95: Check branch stack sampling : --- start --- Testing user branch stack sampling ---- end ---- Check branch stack sampling: FAILED! # Output after: # ./perf test -Fv 95 95: Check branch stack sampling : --- start --- ---- end ---- Check branch stack sampling: Skip # Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter --- tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh index 113ccd17bf03..dedaf74164dc 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 # German Gomez , 2022 +# s390 does not support branch sampling, omit +[ $(uname -m) = "s390" -o $(uname -m) = "s390x" ] && exit 2 + # we need a C compiler to build the test programs # so bail if none is found if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then -- 2.36.1