From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, yangjihong1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix syzkaller reported issue "Internal error in read_pmevcntrn"
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 05:48:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202208050525.mCzcYS6u-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220804105918.113833-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Hi Yang,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19 next-20220804]
[cannot apply to acme/perf/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Jihong/perf-core-Fix-syzkaller-reported-issue-Internal-error-in-read_pmevcntrn/20220804-190347
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 326ecc15c61c349cd49d1700ff9e3e31c6fd1cd5
config: x86_64-randconfig-a015 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220805/202208050525.mCzcYS6u-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/9c758a8d3d13d1ac89f651850b79d91b23b41b02
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Yang-Jihong/perf-core-Fix-syzkaller-reported-issue-Internal-error-in-read_pmevcntrn/20220804-190347
git checkout 9c758a8d3d13d1ac89f651850b79d91b23b41b02
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:54,
from include/linux/wait.h:9,
from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
from include/linux/fs.h:6,
from kernel/events/core.c:11:
kernel/events/core.c: In function 'perf_output_read_group':
>> kernel/events/core.c:6942:27: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function)
6942 | local_irq_restore(flags);
| ^~~~~
include/linux/typecheck.h:11:16: note: in definition of macro 'typecheck'
11 | typeof(x) __dummy2; \
| ^
include/linux/irqflags.h:228:22: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_irqs_disabled_flags'
228 | if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/core.c:6942:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
6942 | local_irq_restore(flags);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/core.c:6942:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
6942 | local_irq_restore(flags);
| ^~~~~
include/linux/typecheck.h:11:16: note: in definition of macro 'typecheck'
11 | typeof(x) __dummy2; \
| ^
include/linux/irqflags.h:228:22: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_irqs_disabled_flags'
228 | if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/core.c:6942:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
6942 | local_irq_restore(flags);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/typecheck.h:12:25: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
12 | (void)(&__dummy == &__dummy2); \
| ^~
include/linux/irqflags.h:193:17: note: in expansion of macro 'typecheck'
193 | typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
| ^~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:228:22: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_irqs_disabled_flags'
228 | if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/core.c:6942:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
6942 | local_irq_restore(flags);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/typecheck.h:12:25: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
12 | (void)(&__dummy == &__dummy2); \
| ^~
include/linux/irqflags.h:182:17: note: in expansion of macro 'typecheck'
182 | typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
| ^~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:230:17: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_local_irq_restore'
230 | raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/core.c:6942:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
6942 | local_irq_restore(flags);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/flags +6942 kernel/events/core.c
6896
6897 static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
6898 struct perf_event *event,
6899 u64 enabled, u64 running)
6900 {
6901 struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader, *sub;
6902 u64 read_format = event->attr.read_format;
6903 u64 values[6];
6904 int n = 0;
6905
6906 values[n++] = 1 + leader->nr_siblings;
6907
6908 if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
6909 values[n++] = enabled;
6910
6911 if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
6912 values[n++] = running;
6913
6914 if ((leader != event) &&
6915 (leader->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE))
6916 leader->pmu->read(leader);
6917
6918 values[n++] = perf_event_count(leader);
6919 if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
6920 values[n++] = primary_event_id(leader);
6921 if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_LOST)
6922 values[n++] = atomic64_read(&leader->lost_samples);
6923
6924 __output_copy(handle, values, n * sizeof(u64));
6925
6926 for_each_sibling_event(sub, leader) {
6927 n = 0;
6928
6929 if ((sub != event) &&
6930 (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE))
6931 sub->pmu->read(sub);
6932
6933 values[n++] = perf_event_count(sub);
6934 if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
6935 values[n++] = primary_event_id(sub);
6936 if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_LOST)
6937 values[n++] = atomic64_read(&sub->lost_samples);
6938
6939 __output_copy(handle, values, n * sizeof(u64));
6940 }
6941
> 6942 local_irq_restore(flags);
6943 }
6944
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-04 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-04 10:59 [PATCH] perf/core: Fix syzkaller reported issue "Internal error in read_pmevcntrn" Yang Jihong
2022-08-04 18:55 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-04 21:48 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-08-05 0:41 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202208050525.mCzcYS6u-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).