From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix cpu check to use id.cpu.cpu in aggr_printout
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:12:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221006114225.66303-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
perf stat has options to aggregate the counts in different
modes like per socket, per core etc. The function "aggr_printout"
in util/stat-display.c which is used to print the aggregates,
has a check for cpu in case of AGGR_NONE. This check was
originally using condition : "if (id.cpu.cpu > -1)". But
this got changed after commit df936cadfb58 ("perf stat: Add
JSON output option"), which added option to output json format
for different aggregation modes. After this commit, the
check in "aggr_printout" is using "if (id.core > -1)".
The old code was using "id.cpu.cpu > -1" while the new code
is using "id.core > -1". But since the value printed is
id.cpu.cpu, fix this check to use cpu and not core.
Suggested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
---
Note: Details for discussion on this logic:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg22473.html
tools/perf/util/stat-display.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
index b82844cb0ce7..cf28020798ec 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config *config,
id.socket,
id.die,
id.core);
- } else if (id.core > -1) {
+ } else if (id.cpu.cpu > -1) {
fprintf(config->output, "\"cpu\" : \"%d\", ",
id.cpu.cpu);
}
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config *config,
id.die,
config->csv_output ? 0 : -3,
id.core, config->csv_sep);
- } else if (id.core > -1) {
+ } else if (id.cpu.cpu > -1) {
fprintf(config->output, "CPU%*d%s",
config->csv_output ? 0 : -7,
id.cpu.cpu, config->csv_sep);
--
2.31.1
reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221006114225.66303-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).