From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <jolsa@redhat.com>, <namhyung@kernel.org>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
<ananth.narayan@amd.com>, <santosh.shukla@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: Don't allow grouping events from different hw pmus
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:33:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221122080326.228-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com> (raw)
Event group from different hw pmus does not make sense and thus perf
has never allowed it. However, with recent rewrite that restriction
has been inadvertently removed. Fix it.
Fixes: bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling")
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 5f262f91cd31..4ee866ef075d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -12499,15 +12499,21 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
* perf_event_pmu_context.
*/
pmu = group_leader->pmu_ctx->pmu;
- } else if (!is_software_event(event) &&
- is_software_event(group_leader) &&
- (group_leader->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE)) {
- /*
- * In case the group is a pure software group, and we
- * try to add a hardware event, move the whole group to
- * the hardware context.
- */
- move_group = 1;
+ } else if (!is_software_event(event)) {
+ if (is_software_event(group_leader) &&
+ (group_leader->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE)) {
+ /*
+ * In case the group is a pure software group, and we
+ * try to add a hardware event, move the whole group to
+ * the hardware context.
+ */
+ move_group = 1;
+ }
+
+ /* Don't allow group of multiple hw events from different pmus */
+ if (!in_software_context(group_leader) &&
+ group_leader->pmu_ctx->pmu != pmu)
+ goto err_locked;
}
}
--
2.38.1
reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221122080326.228-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).