From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] perf bpf filter: Add 'pid' sample data support
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:13:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230219061329.1001079-6-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230219061329.1001079-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
The pid is special because it's saved in the PERF_SAMPLE_TID together.
So it needs to differenciate tid and pid using the 'part' field in the
perf bpf filter entry struct.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 4 +++-
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 3 ++-
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l | 11 ++++++++++-
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y | 7 +++++--
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h | 3 ++-
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 5 ++++-
6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index 11fb391c92e9..2e02dc965dd9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel)
list_for_each_entry(expr, &evsel->bpf_filters, list) {
struct perf_bpf_filter_entry entry = {
.op = expr->op,
+ .part = expr->part,
.flags = expr->sample_flags,
.value = expr->val,
};
@@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel)
return skel ? skel->bss->dropped : 0;
}
-struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags,
+struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags, int part,
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op,
unsigned long val)
{
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flag
expr = malloc(sizeof(*expr));
if (expr != NULL) {
expr->sample_flags = sample_flags;
+ expr->part = part;
expr->op = op;
expr->val = val;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
index 36b44c8188ab..4fb33d296d9c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr {
struct list_head list;
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op;
+ int part;
unsigned long sample_flags;
unsigned long val;
};
@@ -16,7 +17,7 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr {
struct evsel;
#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
-struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags,
+struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags, int part,
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op,
unsigned long val);
int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l
index 34c6a9fd4fa4..5117c76c7c7a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l
@@ -10,7 +10,15 @@
static int sample(unsigned long sample_flag)
{
- perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample = sample_flag;
+ perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.type = sample_flag;
+ perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.part = 0;
+ return BFT_SAMPLE;
+}
+
+static int sample_part(unsigned long sample_flag, int part)
+{
+ perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.type = sample_flag;
+ perf_bpf_filter_lval.sample.part = part;
return BFT_SAMPLE;
}
@@ -46,6 +54,7 @@ num_hex 0[Xx][0-9a-fA-F]+
ip { return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_IP); }
id { return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_ID); }
tid { return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_TID); }
+pid { return sample_part(PERF_SAMPLE_TID, 1); }
cpu { return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_CPU); }
time { return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_TIME); }
addr { return sample(PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR); }
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y
index 510e944a6fa2..0c6035937a6e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y
@@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ static void perf_bpf_filter_error(struct list_head *expr __maybe_unused,
%union
{
unsigned long num;
- unsigned long sample;
+ struct {
+ unsigned long type;
+ int part;
+ } sample;
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op;
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *expr;
}
@@ -47,7 +50,7 @@ filter_term
filter_term:
BFT_SAMPLE BFT_OP BFT_NUM
{
- $$ = perf_bpf_filter_expr__new($1, $2, $3);
+ $$ = perf_bpf_filter_expr__new($1.type, $1.part, $2, $3);
}
%%
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
index 862060bfda14..6b9fd554ad7b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ enum perf_bpf_filter_op {
/* BPF map entry for filtering */
struct perf_bpf_filter_entry {
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op;
- __u64 flags;
+ __u32 part; /* sub-sample type info when it has multiple values */
+ __u64 flags; /* perf sample type flags */
__u64 value;
};
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
index 1aa6a4cacd51..e9a0633d638d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c
@@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ static inline __u64 perf_get_sample(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *kctx,
case PERF_SAMPLE_ID:
return kctx->data->id;
case PERF_SAMPLE_TID:
- return kctx->data->tid_entry.tid;
+ if (entry->part)
+ return kctx->data->tid_entry.pid;
+ else
+ return kctx->data->tid_entry.tid;
case PERF_SAMPLE_CPU:
return kctx->data->cpu_entry.cpu;
case PERF_SAMPLE_TIME:
--
2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-19 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-19 6:13 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Implement BPF sample filter (v2) Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf bpf filter: Introduce basic BPF filter expression Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf bpf filter: Implement event sample filtering Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 11:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-19 16:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-02-22 19:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-02-21 11:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-02-22 19:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf record: Add BPF event filter support Namhyung Kim
2023-02-21 11:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-02-22 19:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf record: Record dropped sample count Namhyung Kim
2023-02-21 11:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-02-19 6:13 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf bpf filter: Add more weight sample data support Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf bpf filter: Add data_src " Namhyung Kim
2023-02-19 6:13 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf bpf filter: Add logical OR operator Namhyung Kim
2023-02-23 14:47 ` [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Implement BPF sample filter (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-23 21:49 ` Namhyung Kim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-02-22 23:01 [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf record: Implement BPF sample filter (v3) Namhyung Kim
2023-02-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf bpf filter: Add 'pid' sample data support Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230219061329.1001079-6-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).