From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] perf record: Record dropped sample count
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:42:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230314234237.3008956-5-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230314234237.3008956-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
When it uses bpf filters, event might drop some samples. It'd be nice
if it can report how many samples it lost. As LOST_SAMPLES event can
carry the similar information, let's use it for bpf filters.
To indicate it's from BPF filters, add a new misc flag for that and
do not display cpu load warnings.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h | 2 ++
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 7 ++++++
tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 5 ++++
tools/perf/util/session.c | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h
index ad47d7b31046..51b9338f4c11 100644
--- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h
+++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct perf_record_lost {
__u64 lost;
};
+#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF (1 << 15)
+
struct perf_record_lost_samples {
struct perf_event_header header;
__u64 lost;
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 33ebe42b025e..6df8b823859d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
#include "util/pmu-hybrid.h"
#include "util/evlist-hybrid.h"
#include "util/off_cpu.h"
+#include "util/bpf-filter.h"
#include "asm/bug.h"
#include "perf.h"
#include "cputopo.h"
@@ -1856,24 +1857,16 @@ record__switch_output(struct record *rec, bool at_exit)
return fd;
}
-static void __record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
+static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost,
- int cpu_idx, int thread_idx)
+ int cpu_idx, int thread_idx, u64 lost_count,
+ u16 misc_flag)
{
- struct perf_counts_values count;
struct perf_sample_id *sid;
struct perf_sample sample = {};
int id_hdr_size;
- if (perf_evsel__read(&evsel->core, cpu_idx, thread_idx, &count) < 0) {
- pr_debug("read LOST count failed\n");
- return;
- }
-
- if (count.lost == 0)
- return;
-
- lost->lost = count.lost;
+ lost->lost = lost_count;
if (evsel->core.ids) {
sid = xyarray__entry(evsel->core.sample_id, cpu_idx, thread_idx);
sample.id = sid->id;
@@ -1882,6 +1875,7 @@ static void __record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
id_hdr_size = perf_event__synthesize_id_sample((void *)(lost + 1),
evsel->core.attr.sample_type, &sample);
lost->header.size = sizeof(*lost) + id_hdr_size;
+ lost->header.misc = misc_flag;
record__write(rec, NULL, lost, lost->header.size);
}
@@ -1905,6 +1899,7 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
struct xyarray *xy = evsel->core.sample_id;
+ u64 lost_count;
if (xy == NULL || evsel->core.fd == NULL)
continue;
@@ -1916,12 +1911,27 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
for (int x = 0; x < xyarray__max_x(xy); x++) {
for (int y = 0; y < xyarray__max_y(xy); y++) {
- __record__read_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, x, y);
+ struct perf_counts_values count;
+
+ if (perf_evsel__read(&evsel->core, x, y, &count) < 0) {
+ pr_debug("read LOST count failed\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (count.lost) {
+ __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost,
+ x, y, count.lost, 0);
+ }
}
}
+
+ lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel);
+ if (lost_count)
+ __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0, 0, lost_count,
+ PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF);
}
+out:
free(lost);
-
}
static volatile sig_atomic_t workload_exec_errno;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
index f20e1bc03778..7bd6f2e41513 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c
@@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel)
return 0;
}
+u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel)
+{
+ struct sample_filter_bpf *skel = evsel->bpf_skel;
+
+ return skel ? skel->bss->dropped : 0;
+}
+
struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flags,
enum perf_bpf_filter_op op,
unsigned long val)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
index eb8e1ac43cdf..f0c66764c6d0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct perf_bpf_filter_expr *perf_bpf_filter_expr__new(unsigned long sample_flag
int perf_bpf_filter__parse(struct list_head *expr_head, const char *str);
int perf_bpf_filter__prepare(struct evsel *evsel);
int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel);
+u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel);
#else /* !HAVE_BPF_SKEL */
@@ -38,5 +39,9 @@ static inline int perf_bpf_filter__destroy(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+static inline u64 perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* HAVE_BPF_SKEL*/
#endif /* PERF_UTIL_BPF_FILTER_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 749d5b5c135b..7d8d057d1772 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -1582,7 +1582,8 @@ static int machines__deliver_event(struct machines *machines,
evlist->stats.total_lost += event->lost.lost;
return tool->lost(tool, event, sample, machine);
case PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES:
- if (tool->lost_samples == perf_event__process_lost_samples)
+ if (tool->lost_samples == perf_event__process_lost_samples &&
+ !(event->header.misc & PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF))
evlist->stats.total_lost_samples += event->lost_samples.lost;
return tool->lost_samples(tool, event, sample, machine);
case PERF_RECORD_READ:
--
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 23:42 [PATCHSET 00/10] perf record: Implement BPF sample filter (v5) Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf bpf filter: Introduce basic BPF filter expression Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf bpf filter: Implement event sample filtering Namhyung Kim
2023-03-15 16:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-15 16:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-15 16:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-15 20:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-16 5:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-16 10:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf record: Add BPF event filter support Namhyung Kim
2023-03-15 13:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-15 16:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-15 16:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-14 23:42 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf bpf filter: Add 'pid' sample data support Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf bpf filter: Add more weight " Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf bpf filter: Add data_src " Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf bpf filter: Add logical OR operator Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf bpf filter: Show warning for missing sample flags Namhyung Kim
2023-03-14 23:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf record: Update documentation for BPF filters Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230314234237.3008956-5-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).