From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf lock contention: Improve performance if map is full (v1)
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:06:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406210611.1622492-1-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
Hello,
I got a report that the overhead of perf lock contention is too big in
some cases. It was running the task aggregation mode (-t) at the moment
and there were lots of tasks contending each other.
It turned out that the hash map update is a problem. The result is saved
in the lock_stat hash map which is pre-allocated. The BPF program never
deletes data in the map, but just adds. But if the map is full, (try to)
update the map becomes a very heavy operation - since it needs to check
every CPU's freelist to get a new node to save the result. But we know
it'd fail when the map is full. No need to update then.
I've checked it on my 64 CPU machine with this.
$ perf bench sched messaging -g 1000
# Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 1000 groups == 40000 processes run
Total time: 2.825 [sec]
And I used the task mode, so that it can guarantee the map is full.
The default map entry size is 16K and this workload has 40K tasks.
Before:
$ sudo ./perf lock con -abt -E3 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 1000
# Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 1000 groups == 40000 processes run
Total time: 11.299 [sec]
contended total wait max wait avg wait pid comm
19284 3.51 s 3.70 ms 181.91 us 1305863 sched-messaging
243 84.09 ms 466.67 us 346.04 us 1336608 sched-messaging
177 66.35 ms 12.08 ms 374.88 us 1220416 node
After:
$ sudo ./perf lock con -abt -E3 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 1000
# Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 1000 groups == 40000 processes run
Total time: 3.044 [sec]
contended total wait max wait avg wait pid comm
18743 591.92 ms 442.96 us 31.58 us 1431454 sched-messaging
51 210.64 ms 207.45 ms 4.13 ms 1468724 sched-messaging
81 68.61 ms 65.79 ms 847.07 us 1463183 sched-messaging
=== output for debug ===
bad: 1164137, total: 2253341
bad rate: 51.66 %
histogram of failure reasons
task: 0
stack: 0
time: 0
data: 1164137
The first few patches are small cleanups and fixes. You can get the code
from 'perf/lock-map-v1' branch in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
Thanks,
Namhyung
Namhyung Kim (7):
perf lock contention: Simplify parse_lock_type()
perf lock contention: Use -M for --map-nr-entries
perf lock contention: Update default map size to 16384
perf lock contention: Add data failure stat
perf lock contention: Update total/bad stats for hidden entries
perf lock contention: Revise needs_callstack() condition
perf lock contention: Do not try to update if hash map is full
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt | 4 +-
tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 64 ++++++++-----------
tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 7 +-
.../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 29 +++++++--
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h | 3 +
tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h | 2 +
6 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
base-commit: e5116f46d44b72ede59a6923829f68a8b8f84e76
--
2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 21:06 Namhyung Kim [this message]
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf lock contention: Simplify parse_lock_type() Namhyung Kim
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf lock contention: Use -M for --map-nr-entries Namhyung Kim
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf lock contention: Update default map size to 16384 Namhyung Kim
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf lock contention: Add data failure stat Namhyung Kim
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf lock contention: Update total/bad stats for hidden entries Namhyung Kim
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf lock contention: Revise needs_callstack() condition Namhyung Kim
2023-04-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf lock contention: Do not try to update if hash map is full Namhyung Kim
2023-04-07 0:35 ` [PATCHSET 0/7] perf lock contention: Improve performance if map is full (v1) Ian Rogers
2023-04-07 0:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406210611.1622492-1-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).