Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	<jolsa@kernel.org>, <namhyung@kernel.org>, <irogers@google.com>,
	<adrian.hunter@intel.com>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix perf_sample_data not properly initialized for different swevents in perf_tp_event()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:52:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412095240.181516-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)

data->sample_flags may be modified in perf_prepare_sample(),
in perf_tp_event(), different swevents use the same on-stack
perf_sample_data, the previous swevent may change sample_flags in
perf_prepare_sample(), as a result, some members of perf_sample_data are
not correctly initialized when next swevent_event preparing sample
(for example data->id, the value varies according to swevent).

A simple scenario triggers this problem is as follows:

  # perf record -e sched:sched_switch --switch-output-event sched:sched_switch -a sleep 1
  [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 0 times ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209014396 ]
  [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 0 times ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209014662 ]
  [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 0 times ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209014910 ]
  [ perf record: Woken up 0 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209015164 ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.069 MB perf.data.<timestamp> ]
  # ls -l
  total 860
  -rw------- 1 root root  95694 Apr 12 09:01 perf.data.2023041209014396
  -rw------- 1 root root 606430 Apr 12 09:01 perf.data.2023041209014662
  -rw------- 1 root root  82246 Apr 12 09:01 perf.data.2023041209014910
  -rw------- 1 root root  82342 Apr 12 09:01 perf.data.2023041209015164
  # perf script -i perf.data.2023041209014396
  0x11d58 [0x80]: failed to process type: 9 [Bad address]

Solution: Add perf_sample_data_flags_{save, restore} helpers to save and
restore sample_flags when processing different swevents

After fix:

  # perf record -e sched:sched_switch --switch-output-event sched:sched_switch -a sleep 1
  [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 0 times ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209442259 ]
  [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 0 times ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209442514 ]
  [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 0 times ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209442760 ]
  [ perf record: Woken up 0 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2023041209443003 ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.069 MB perf.data.<timestamp> ]
  # ls -l
  total 864
  -rw------- 1 root root 100166 Apr 12 09:44 perf.data.2023041209442259
  -rw------- 1 root root 606438 Apr 12 09:44 perf.data.2023041209442514
  -rw------- 1 root root  82246 Apr 12 09:44 perf.data.2023041209442760
  -rw------- 1 root root  82342 Apr 12 09:44 perf.data.2023041209443003
  # perf script -i perf.data.2023041209442259 | head -n 5
              perf   232 [000]    66.846217: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=232 prev_prio=120 prev_state=D ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=234 next_prio=120
              perf   234 [000]    66.846449: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=234 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=232 next_prio=120
              perf   232 [000]    66.846546: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=232 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=234 next_prio=120
              perf   234 [000]    66.846606: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=234 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=232 next_prio=120
              perf   232 [000]    66.846646: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=232 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=234 next_prio=120

Fixes: bb447c27a467 ("perf/core: Set data->sample_flags in perf_prepare_sample()")
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h | 11 +++++++++++
 kernel/events/core.c       | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d5628a7b5eaa..7499bd3a2ed5 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1185,6 +1185,17 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
 		    PERF_MEM_S(LOCK, NA)  |\
 		    PERF_MEM_S(TLB, NA))
 
+/* Note: caller must ensure flags is not NULL */
+static inline void perf_sample_data_flags_save(struct perf_sample_data *data, u64 *flags)
+{
+	*flags = data->sample_flags;
+}
+
+static inline void perf_sample_data_flags_restore(struct perf_sample_data *data, u64 flags)
+{
+	data->sample_flags = flags;
+}
+
 static inline void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data,
 					 u64 addr, u64 period)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 435815d3be3f..ea1fb63a6037 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -10136,6 +10136,7 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
 {
 	struct perf_sample_data data;
 	struct perf_event *event;
+	u64 sample_flags;
 
 	struct perf_raw_record raw = {
 		.frag = {
@@ -10150,8 +10151,18 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
 	perf_trace_buf_update(record, event_type);
 
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(event, head, hlist_entry) {
-		if (perf_tp_event_match(event, &data, regs))
+		if (perf_tp_event_match(event, &data, regs)) {
+			/*
+			 * sample_flags may be modified in perf_event_output_*
+			 * (see perf_prepare_sample). For different swevents,
+			 * use the same on-stack perf_sample_data, therefore,
+			 * need to save samle_flags, and restore it
+			 * after perf_swevent_event.
+			 */
+			perf_sample_data_flags_save(&data, &sample_flags);
 			perf_swevent_event(event, count, &data, regs);
+			perf_sample_data_flags_restore(&data, sample_flags);
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.30.GIT


             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12  9:52 Yang Jihong [this message]
2023-04-17 11:45 ` [PATCH] perf/core: Fix perf_sample_data not properly initialized for different swevents in perf_tp_event() Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-18  1:35   ` Yang Jihong
2023-04-18 10:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-19  1:47       ` Yang Jihong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230412095240.181516-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox