From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org (open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS
SUBSYSTEM)
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/3] treewide: replace put_task_struct() with the atomic safe version
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:43:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230425114307.36889-4-wander@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425114307.36889-1-wander@redhat.com>
In places where put_task_struct() is called in a non-sleepable context,
we replace those calls by put_task_struct_atomic_safe().
These call sites were found by running internal regression tests and
looking for warnings generated by put_task_might_resched().
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 6 +++---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 10 +++++-----
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +++---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 16 ++++++++--------
kernel/sched/rt.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 435815d3be3f..8f823da02324 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
if (ctx->parent_ctx)
put_ctx(ctx->parent_ctx);
if (ctx->task && ctx->task != TASK_TOMBSTONE)
- put_task_struct(ctx->task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(ctx->task);
call_rcu(&ctx->rcu_head, free_ctx);
}
}
@@ -13019,7 +13019,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child)
RCU_INIT_POINTER(child->perf_event_ctxp, NULL);
put_ctx(child_ctx); /* cannot be last */
WRITE_ONCE(child_ctx->task, TASK_TOMBSTONE);
- put_task_struct(current); /* cannot be last */
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(current); /* cannot be last */
clone_ctx = unclone_ctx(child_ctx);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
@@ -13124,7 +13124,7 @@ void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task)
*/
RCU_INIT_POINTER(task->perf_event_ctxp, NULL);
WRITE_ONCE(ctx->task, TASK_TOMBSTONE);
- put_task_struct(task); /* cannot be last */
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(task); /* cannot be last */
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 728f434de2bb..3ecb8d6ae039 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_up_q(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wqh->rtlock_task) {
wake_up_state(wqh->rtlock_task, TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT);
- put_task_struct(wqh->rtlock_task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(wqh->rtlock_task);
wqh->rtlock_task = NULL;
}
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
"task: %s (%d)\n", max_lock_depth,
top_task->comm, task_pid_nr(top_task));
}
- put_task_struct(task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(task);
return -EDEADLK;
}
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* No requeue[7] here. Just release @task [8]
*/
raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock);
- put_task_struct(task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(task);
/*
* [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock.
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
/* [8] Release the task */
raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock);
- put_task_struct(task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(task);
/*
* [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock.
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
out_unlock_pi:
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
out_put_task:
- put_task_struct(task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(task);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0d18c3969f90..a4783f0c9f01 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
* the queueing in wake_q_add() so as not to miss wakeups.
*/
wake_up_process(task);
- put_task_struct(task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(task);
}
}
@@ -2528,7 +2528,7 @@ int push_cpu_stop(void *arg)
raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
return 0;
}
@@ -9316,7 +9316,7 @@ static int __balance_push_cpu_stop(void *arg)
rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 71b24371a6f7..0f8b8a490dc0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static void dl_change_utilization(struct task_struct *p, u64 new_bw)
* so we are still safe.
*/
if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) == 1)
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
}
__sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl);
__add_rq_bw(new_bw, &rq->dl);
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static void task_contending(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int flags)
* so we are still safe.
*/
if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&dl_se->inactive_timer) == 1)
- put_task_struct(dl_task_of(dl_se));
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(dl_task_of(dl_se));
} else {
/*
* Since "dl_non_contending" is not set, the
@@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
* This can free the task_struct, including this hrtimer, do not touch
* anything related to that after this.
*/
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
@@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0;
unlock:
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
@@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu __maybe_unused
* so we are still safe.
*/
if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) == 1)
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
}
sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
@@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
/* No more tasks */
goto out;
- put_task_struct(next_task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(next_task);
next_task = task;
goto retry;
}
@@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq);
out:
- put_task_struct(next_task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(next_task);
return ret;
}
@@ -2633,7 +2633,7 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) == 1)
- put_task_struct(p);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(p);
/* If p is not queued we will update its parameters at next wakeup. */
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 0a11f44adee5..e58a84535f61 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq, bool pull)
/*
* Something has shifted, try again.
*/
- put_task_struct(next_task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(next_task);
next_task = task;
goto retry;
}
@@ -2163,7 +2163,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq, bool pull)
double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq);
out:
- put_task_struct(next_task);
+ put_task_struct_atomic_safe(next_task);
return ret;
}
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-25 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 11:43 [PATCH v7 0/3] Introduce put_task_struct_atomic_sleep() Wander Lairson Costa
2023-04-25 11:43 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] sched/core: warn on call put_task_struct in invalid context Wander Lairson Costa
2023-04-28 16:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-02 14:46 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-04-25 11:43 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] sched/task: Add the put_task_struct_atomic_safe() function Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-04 9:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-05-04 12:24 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 12:24 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 12:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-05-04 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-04 14:55 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 15:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-05-04 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-05 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-04 18:29 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 19:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-05-04 19:38 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 20:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-05-08 12:30 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-04 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-04 18:21 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-05-05 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-05 14:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-05 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-08 12:28 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2023-04-25 11:43 ` Wander Lairson Costa [this message]
2023-04-26 12:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Introduce put_task_struct_atomic_sleep() Valentin Schneider
2023-04-26 17:44 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230425114307.36889-4-wander@redhat.com \
--to=wander@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).