From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
shy828301@gmail.com, denik@google.com,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf: cs-etm: Validate options after applying themperf_pmu__format_bits
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 06:10:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230427221047.GA174797@leoy-huanghe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dac76dd5-d5f0-61dd-fafe-f939f1ebc413@arm.com>
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 04:52:06PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
[...]
> >> -static int cs_etm_set_context_id(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >> - struct evsel *evsel, int cpu)
> >> +static int cs_etm_validate_context_id(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >> + struct evsel *evsel, int cpu)
> >> {
> >> - struct cs_etm_recording *ptr;
> >> - struct perf_pmu *cs_etm_pmu;
> >> + struct cs_etm_recording *ptr =
> >> + container_of(itr, struct cs_etm_recording, itr);
> >> + struct perf_pmu *cs_etm_pmu = ptr->cs_etm_pmu;
> >> char path[PATH_MAX];
> >> - int err = -EINVAL;
> >> + int err;
> >> u32 val;
> >> - u64 contextid;
> >> + u64 contextid =
> >> + evsel->core.attr.config &
> >> + (perf_pmu__format_bits(&cs_etm_pmu->format, "contextid1") |
> >> + perf_pmu__format_bits(&cs_etm_pmu->format, "contextid2"));
> >
> > Seems to me, this would break backward compability.
> >
> > The old kernel (before 5.11) doesn't provide 'contextid1' and
> > 'contextid2', so we always check the entry 'contextid' rather than
> > 'contextid1' and 'contextid2'.
> >
> > With this change, if a kernel doesn't contain 'contextid1' and
> > 'contextid2' formats, will perf tool never trace for contexid?
> >
>
> No because I changed to to be purely validation, so the format flags
> would still be applied. But yes I think you are right there is a small
> issue.
>
> Now validation of 'contextid' isn't done on pre 5.11 kernels. But that
> only checks for ETMv3 anyway.
IIUC, 'contextid' is not only used for ETMv3. Just quotes the comments
from drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c:
73 /*
74 * contextid always traces the "PID". The PID is in CONTEXTIDR_EL1
75 * when the kernel is running at EL1; when the kernel is at EL2,
76 * the PID is in CONTEXTIDR_EL2.
77 */
ETMv4 uses 'contextid' as well, since the user space needs to know which
exception level's PID should be traced, e.g. when CPU runs in EL2
'contextid' is set as ETM_OPT_CTXTID2, the perf tool will set 'contextid2'
to tell driver to trace CONTEXTIDR_EL2.
We can only verify 'contextid', and set 'contextid1' or 'contextid2' based
on CPU running exception level, finally driver knows how to trace PID.
Thanks,
Leo
> Validation of 'contextid1' and
> 'contextid2' isn't a problem, because if the kernel doesn't support them
> they can't be applied on the command line anyway.
>
> I can fix it by checking for 'contextid' and ETMv3 first and then doing
> 'contextid1' and 'contextid2' after.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-27 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-24 13:47 [PATCH 0/7] perf: cs-etm: Fixes around timestamped and timeless decoding James Clark
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: cs-etm: Fix timeless decode mode detection James Clark
2023-04-24 15:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-04-26 5:42 ` Denis Nikitin
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf tools: Add util function for overriding user set config values James Clark
2023-04-24 15:36 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-04-24 16:43 ` James Clark
2023-04-24 17:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-25 11:03 ` James Clark
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf: cs-etm: Don't test full_auxtrace because it's always set James Clark
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf: cs-etm: Validate options after applying them James Clark
2023-04-27 15:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf: cs-etm: Validate options after applying themperf_pmu__format_bits Leo Yan
2023-04-27 15:52 ` James Clark
2023-04-27 22:10 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2023-04-28 12:33 ` James Clark
2023-05-01 7:34 ` Leo Yan
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf: cs-etm: Allow user to override timestamp and contextid settings James Clark
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf: cs-etm: Use bool type for boolean values James Clark
2023-04-24 13:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf: cs-etm: Add separate decode paths for timeless and per-thread modes James Clark
2023-04-26 3:16 ` [PATCH 0/7] perf: cs-etm: Fixes around timestamped and timeless decoding Denis Nikitin
2023-04-26 16:06 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230427221047.GA174797@leoy-huanghe \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=denik@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).