From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
ricardo.neri@intel.com, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, davem@davemloft.net,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/17] watchdog/hardlockup: change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 15:13:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230504151100.v4.3.Ic3a19b592eb1ac4c6f6eade44ffd943e8637b6e5@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504221349.1535669-1-dianders@chromium.org>
From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Nobody cares about the return value of watchdog_nmi_enable(),
changing its prototype to void.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
I yanked this patch from the mailing lists [1] into my series just to
make it easier to avoid conflicts between my series and the one adding
the arm64 perf hardlockup detector, in case someone wanted to test
them both together. This is a nice cleanup and could land together
with the rest of my series if that makes sense.
I changed the patch prefix to match others in my series.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220903093415.15850-3-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com/
Changes in v4:
- Pulled ("change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void") into my series for v4.
arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c | 8 +++-----
include/linux/nmi.h | 2 +-
kernel/watchdog.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
index 060fff95a305..5dcf31f7e81f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -282,11 +282,11 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", setup_nmi_watchdog);
* sparc specific NMI watchdog enable function.
* Enables watchdog if it is not enabled already.
*/
-int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
+void watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
{
if (atomic_read(&nmi_active) == -1) {
pr_warn("NMI watchdog cannot be enabled or disabled\n");
- return -1;
+ return;
}
/*
@@ -295,11 +295,9 @@ int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
* process first.
*/
if (!nmi_init_done)
- return 0;
+ return;
smp_call_function_single(cpu, start_nmi_watchdog, NULL, 1);
-
- return 0;
}
/*
* sparc specific NMI watchdog disable function.
diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 771d77b62bc1..454fe99c4874 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static inline int hardlockup_detector_perf_init(void) { return 0; }
void watchdog_nmi_stop(void);
void watchdog_nmi_start(void);
int watchdog_nmi_probe(void);
-int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu);
+void watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu);
void watchdog_nmi_disable(unsigned int cpu);
void lockup_detector_reconfigure(void);
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 582d572e1379..c705a18b26bf 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -93,10 +93,9 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", hardlockup_panic_setup);
* softlockup watchdog start and stop. The arch must select the
* SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR Kconfig.
*/
-int __weak watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
+void __weak watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
{
hardlockup_detector_perf_enable();
- return 0;
}
void __weak watchdog_nmi_disable(unsigned int cpu)
--
2.40.1.521.gf1e218fcd8-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-04 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-04 22:13 [PATCH v4 00/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Add the buddy hardlockup detector Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] watchdog/perf: Define dummy watchdog_update_hrtimer_threshold() on correct config Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 2:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-11 8:39 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] watchdog: remove WATCHDOG_DEFAULT Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` Douglas Anderson [this message]
2023-05-05 2:45 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] watchdog/hardlockup: change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] watchdog/perf: Ensure CPU-bound context when creating hardlockup detector event Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Rename touch_nmi_watchdog() to touch_hardlockup_watchdog() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 2:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:37 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-08 1:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 15:56 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-11 9:24 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] watchdog/perf: Rename watchdog_hld.c to watchdog_perf.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 2:53 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-11 10:09 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Move perf hardlockup checking/panic to common watchdog.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 2:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:37 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-11 12:03 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Style changes to watchdog_hardlockup_check() / ..._is_lockedup() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 3:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:38 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-11 12:45 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Add a "cpu" param to watchdog_hardlockup_check() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-11 14:14 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:21 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Move perf hardlockup watchdog petting to watchdog.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-11 15:46 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:22 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Rename some "NMI watchdog" constants/function Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 3:06 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:38 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-12 11:21 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Have the perf hardlockup use __weak functions more cleanly Douglas Anderson
2023-05-12 11:55 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] watchdog/hardlockup: detect hard lockups using secondary (buddy) CPUs Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05 2:35 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:35 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-08 1:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 15:52 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:23 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] watchdog/perf: Add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] watchdog/perf: Adapt the watchdog_perf interface for async model Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: add hw_nmi_get_sample_period for preparation of lockup detector Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] arm64: Enable perf events based hard " Douglas Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230504151100.v4.3.Ic3a19b592eb1ac4c6f6eade44ffd943e8637b6e5@changeid \
--to=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tzungbi@chromium.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).