linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using IPI as NMI
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 15:00:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230512140051.GA217273@aspen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419155341.v8.9.I2ef26d1b3bfbed2d10a281942b0da7d9854de05e@changeid>

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:56:03PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
>
> arm64 platforms with GICv3 or later supports pseudo NMIs which can be
> leveraged to roundup CPUs which are stuck in hard lockup state with
> interrupts disabled that wouldn't be possible with a normal IPI.
>
> So instead switch to roundup CPUs using IPI turned as NMI. And in
> case a particular arm64 platform doesn't supports pseudo NMIs,
> it will switch back to default kgdb CPUs roundup mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c |  5 +++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
> index c592e92b8cbf..2adaaf1519e5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/kgdb.h>
>  #include <linux/nmi.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>
> @@ -45,10 +46,14 @@ bool arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, bool exclude_self)
>  static irqreturn_t ipi_nmi_handler(int irq, void *data)
>  {
>  	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();

Does this play nice with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT? I may have missed
something about the NMI entry but a quick scan of the arm64
arch_irq_disabled() suggests that debug_smp_processor_id() will issue
warnings at this point...

Other than I didn't see anything I don't like here.


Daniel.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19 22:55 [PATCH v8 00/10] arm64: Add framework to turn an IPI as NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-04-19 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] arm64: Add framework to turn " Douglas Anderson
2023-04-19 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-04-19 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] arm64: smp: Assign and setup an IPI as NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-04-24 17:53   ` Doug Anderson
2023-04-19 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] nmi: backtrace: Allow runtime arch specific override Douglas Anderson
2023-04-19 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] arm64: ipi_nmi: Add support for NMI backtrace Douglas Anderson
2023-04-19 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-05-10 16:43   ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-10 21:13     ` Doug Anderson
2023-04-19 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] kgdb: Expose default CPUs roundup fallback mechanism Douglas Anderson
2023-05-12 13:48   ` Daniel Thompson
2023-05-15 23:21     ` Doug Anderson
2023-06-01 21:47       ` Doug Anderson
2023-04-19 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] kgdb: Provide a stub kgdb_nmicallback() if !CONFIG_KGDB Douglas Anderson
2023-05-11 14:34   ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-12 13:52     ` Daniel Thompson
2023-04-19 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using IPI as NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-05-12 14:00   ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2023-05-15 23:11     ` Doug Anderson
2023-04-19 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] arm64: ipi_nmi: Fallback to a regular IPI if NMI isn't enabled Douglas Anderson
2023-05-10 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] arm64: Add framework to turn an IPI as NMI Doug Anderson
2023-05-10 16:30   ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-10 16:42     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-16 10:09       ` Sumit Garg
2023-06-01 21:46       ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230512140051.GA217273@aspen.lan \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).