From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2664EC7EE23 for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 13:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229723AbjE3NQ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2023 09:16:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42948 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231424AbjE3NQX (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2023 09:16:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B2BEA for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 06:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b038064d97so16401175ad.0 for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 06:16:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1685452579; x=1688044579; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F1zQhS2/5jkiBmblcH1oQk10zWpL+bEnBI7IhlI9oIk=; b=lbXs+dQ9NgilxVcTPf3KJTwb6STClSOSGoQ7bji1QZH6AeacbsrcDGhncJyxmSiZgY Sfecw3aknkpgNhDrhxyF0SIMZR1BDPgbN0lVtzYkQCmqHYGG7mfFikmD+bPz/bX6okb7 f0C6UUCSBciwUq2A0BRlKtjHZO80epP+poV1LxIlAginWEyVkX+9x4D73IIzcK2ggrsC dI8KeDG1dVO6FumvnuTlWXbSclHP+P+oL7Gx3oXnc4JQnPH+JSxYFzr9pGTyph/0PUmg ptud3ApaevPvduGjb8SB0RtXJ6bZhHYRC3aj0hSmg9Uk2I9RCuVumzZA0uW7LzeAs759 tjNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685452579; x=1688044579; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=F1zQhS2/5jkiBmblcH1oQk10zWpL+bEnBI7IhlI9oIk=; b=McSxfQsxr/qZhJaZzFY5GsFAPXuVjHgPptrCaq6MCeXCleTqjbWDbE1Mp8/WDFUTsO CDSRHnafeLVlHK/p+UHb0U2X0QeJvxAcp7A0WDpIHc+Wh/XRho/B0wtdcgaSoWkz1NHK 4HQ4PScgM43lLA2ctPRilzTyoTe3s7i+JjkAPBmawlOuuNOYGGkak4z61+Oq93pNGd4e taRp5BJQAevuhdMOwzG04iusPYyiR2GB6ntmHkWFsJ145eHtLbG2h8HgtZUQATwym4ds mqocr0OyNc8C9MdPprHdspD/V/sx0EhJ0heYrzVO0pr122AUBvwNI5q3KLV8AKtSR0kr umFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwlJ5j7iaiT19RhZ+3JHnKhgHbeLb53sROqN5bujD+Yv6VB9jbm 4QqALFcSQKan8nJWOtNrPmZfBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4bAYm1QAvopIyI87kRCWQK1nedCga4l56oL5VLx/Vmicj5uCts0HruZhPVw+hx8ssoZsEtZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce82:b0:1af:e116:4b42 with SMTP id f2-20020a170902ce8200b001afe1164b42mr11155878plg.34.1685452578868; Tue, 30 May 2023 06:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leoy-yangtze.lan (211-75-219-210.hinet-ip.hinet.net. [211.75.219.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9-20020a170902868900b001ae8b4dc49bsm10239988plo.13.2023.05.30.06.16.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 May 2023 06:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:16:10 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: James Clark Cc: Mike Leach , coresight@lists.linaro.org, denik@chromium.org, Suzuki K Poulose , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , John Garry , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf cs-etm: Track exception level Message-ID: <20230530131610.GA2219355@leoy-yangtze.lan> References: <20230524131958.2139331-1-james.clark@arm.com> <20230524131958.2139331-4-james.clark@arm.com> <830d2a40-655d-7f16-a969-cadbe5b2a1c5@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <830d2a40-655d-7f16-a969-cadbe5b2a1c5@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:24:45AM +0100, James Clark wrote: [...] > >> -static u8 cs_etm__cpu_mode(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u64 address) > >> +static struct machine *cs_etm__get_machine(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, > >> + ocsd_ex_level el) > >> { > >> - struct machine *machine; > >> + /* > >> + * Not perfect, but assume anything in EL1 is the default guest, and > >> + * everything else is the host. nHVE and pKVM may not work with this > >> + * assumption. And distinguishing between guest and host userspaces > >> + * isn't currently supported either. Neither is multiple guest support. > >> + * All this does is reduce the likeliness of decode errors where we look > >> + * into the host kernel maps when it should have been the guest maps. > >> + */ > > > > What effect does this have if I am running with host only, kernel at > > EL1, e.g. any platform that is not running an EL2 kernel? > > I suppose I didn't think about that case. It looks like you'd have to > start using --guest-vmlinux instead of --vmlinux to decode. But that's > probably not what we want. IIUC, it's not about how to pass kernel image path with options "--guest-vmlinux" or "--vmlinux". Let's think a case: Cortex-A53 CPU which doesn't support VHE, or any Arm CPUs which disable the VHE feature. In this case, the host OS and guest OS both run in EL1, only the a KVM hypervisor runs in EL2. You could see with below change, no matter the host OS and guest OS, both use DEFAULT_GUEST_KERNEL_ID to retrieve the guest machine. At the end, this change will break perf tool for host OS. > Is that a standard configuration though? I'm wondering if we need to > support that out of the box, or needing the extra command line argument > is ok? It seems like it's hard to make anything just work without the > user providing extra info. Essentially, we need more info to make decision if a system runs in host or guest, if only depend on it's EL1 or other execptions, it's hard to say it's running in host or guest. We can look into more details: - If CPU enables VHE, then the host kernel runs in EL2 and the guest kernel runs in EL1; - If CPU only enables nVHE (or CPU doesn't support VHE at all), then both the host kernel and the guest kernel runs in EL1; I think we need to retrieve more info from /sys/ node or /proc node: - We need to know if VHE is enabled or not; - If CPU doesn't enable VHE, then both host and guest kernels run in EL1, so we need to use extra info to distinguish it's a host kernel or guest kernel. To be honest, I don't have answers for above two items. I will think a bit more and will share back if have any finding. Thanks, Leo > After this change we also wanted to start setting exclude_guest=1 by > default, so technically this change is only needed when exclude_guest=0. > Otherwise we could assume it's always the host regardless of the EL. It > should be quite easy to check what that setting was in this switch > statement, but it would be temporarily broken in the mean time. And also > we can only make exclude_guest work with FEAT_TRF (v8.4 onwards) > > > > > Mike > > > > > >> + switch (el) { > >> + case ocsd_EL1: > >> + return machines__find_guest(&etm->session->machines, > >> + DEFAULT_GUEST_KERNEL_ID); > >> + case ocsd_EL3: > >> + case ocsd_EL2: > >> + case ocsd_EL0: > >> + case ocsd_EL_unknown: > >> + default: > >> + return &etm->session->machines.host; > >> + } > >> +} > >> > >> - machine = &etmq->etm->session->machines.host; > >> +static u8 cs_etm__cpu_mode(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u64 address, > >> + ocsd_ex_level el) > >> +{ > >> + struct machine *machine = cs_etm__get_machine(etmq->etm, el); > >> > >> if (address >= machine__kernel_start(machine)) { > >> if (machine__is_host(machine)) > >> @@ -893,10 +919,14 @@ static u8 cs_etm__cpu_mode(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u64 address) > >> } else { > >> if (machine__is_host(machine)) > >> return PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER; > >> - else if (perf_guest) > >> + else { > >> + /* > >> + * Can't really happen at the moment because > >> + * cs_etm__get_machine() will always return > >> + * machines.host for any non EL1 trace. > >> + */ > >> return PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER; > >> - else > >> - return PERF_RECORD_MISC_HYPERVISOR; > >> + } > >> } > >> } > >> > >> @@ -913,11 +943,12 @@ static u32 cs_etm__mem_access(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u8 trace_chan_id, > >> if (!etmq) > >> return 0; > >> > >> - cpumode = cs_etm__cpu_mode(etmq, address); > >> tidq = cs_etm__etmq_get_traceid_queue(etmq, trace_chan_id); > >> if (!tidq) > >> return 0; > >> > >> + cpumode = cs_etm__cpu_mode(etmq, address, tidq->el); > >> + > >> if (!thread__find_map(tidq->thread, cpumode, address, &al)) > >> return 0; > >> > >> @@ -1296,9 +1327,10 @@ cs_etm__get_trace(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq) > >> } > >> > >> static void cs_etm__set_thread(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, > >> - struct cs_etm_traceid_queue *tidq, pid_t tid) > >> + struct cs_etm_traceid_queue *tidq, pid_t tid, > >> + ocsd_ex_level el) > >> { > >> - struct machine *machine = &etm->session->machines.host; > >> + struct machine *machine = cs_etm__get_machine(etm, el); > >> > >> if (tid != -1) { > >> thread__zput(tidq->thread); > >> @@ -1308,10 +1340,12 @@ static void cs_etm__set_thread(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, > >> /* Couldn't find a known thread */ > >> if (!tidq->thread) > >> tidq->thread = machine__idle_thread(machine); > >> + > >> + tidq->el = el; > >> } > >> > >> -int cs_etm__etmq_set_tid(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > >> - pid_t tid, u8 trace_chan_id) > >> +int cs_etm__etmq_set_tid_el(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, pid_t tid, u8 trace_chan_id, > >> + ocsd_ex_level el) > >> { > >> struct cs_etm_traceid_queue *tidq; > >> > >> @@ -1319,7 +1353,7 @@ int cs_etm__etmq_set_tid(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > >> if (!tidq) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> > >> - cs_etm__set_thread(etmq->etm, tidq, tid); > >> + cs_etm__set_thread(etmq->etm, tidq, tid, el); > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> @@ -1389,7 +1423,7 @@ static int cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > >> struct perf_sample sample = {.ip = 0,}; > >> > >> event->sample.header.type = PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE; > >> - event->sample.header.misc = cs_etm__cpu_mode(etmq, addr); > >> + event->sample.header.misc = cs_etm__cpu_mode(etmq, addr, tidq->el); > >> event->sample.header.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_header); > >> > >> /* Set time field based on etm auxtrace config. */ > >> @@ -1448,7 +1482,7 @@ static int cs_etm__synth_branch_sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > >> ip = cs_etm__last_executed_instr(tidq->prev_packet); > >> > >> event->sample.header.type = PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE; > >> - event->sample.header.misc = cs_etm__cpu_mode(etmq, ip); > >> + event->sample.header.misc = cs_etm__cpu_mode(etmq, ip, tidq->prev_el); > >> event->sample.header.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_header); > >> > >> /* Set time field based on etm auxtrace config. */ > >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h > >> index 70cac0375b34..88e9b25a8a9f 100644 > >> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h > >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h > >> @@ -232,10 +232,11 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, > >> struct perf_event_attr *cs_etm_get_default_config(struct perf_pmu *pmu); > >> > >> #ifdef HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT > >> +#include > >> int cs_etm__get_cpu(u8 trace_chan_id, int *cpu); > >> int cs_etm__get_pid_fmt(u8 trace_chan_id, u64 *pid_fmt); > >> -int cs_etm__etmq_set_tid(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > >> - pid_t tid, u8 trace_chan_id); > >> +int cs_etm__etmq_set_tid_el(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, pid_t tid, u8 trace_chan_id, > >> + ocsd_ex_level el); > >> bool cs_etm__etmq_is_timeless(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq); > >> void cs_etm__etmq_set_traceid_queue_timestamp(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, > >> u8 trace_chan_id); > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> > > > >