From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm64/perf: Implement branch records save on PMU IRQ
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 09:34:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230531040428.501523-11-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531040428.501523-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
This modifies armv8pmu_branch_read() to concatenate live entries along with
task context stored entries and then process the resultant buffer to create
perf branch entry array for perf_sample_data. It follows the same principle
like task sched out.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
index 0678ebf0a896..e3efc1563111 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
@@ -693,41 +693,45 @@ void armv8pmu_branch_reset(void)
isb();
}
-static bool capture_branch_entry(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc,
- struct perf_event *event, int idx)
+static void brbe_regset_branch_entries(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct brbe_regset *regset, int idx)
{
struct perf_branch_entry *entry = &cpuc->branches->branch_entries[idx];
- u64 brbinf = get_brbinf_reg(idx);
-
- /*
- * There are no valid entries anymore on the buffer.
- * Abort the branch record processing to save some
- * cycles and also reduce the capture/process load
- * for the user space as well.
- */
- if (brbe_invalid(brbinf))
- return false;
+ u64 brbinf = regset[idx].brbinf;
perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(entry);
if (brbe_record_is_complete(brbinf)) {
- entry->from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
- entry->to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ entry->from = regset[idx].brbsrc;
+ entry->to = regset[idx].brbtgt;
} else if (brbe_record_is_source_only(brbinf)) {
- entry->from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
+ entry->from = regset[idx].brbsrc;
entry->to = 0;
} else if (brbe_record_is_target_only(brbinf)) {
entry->from = 0;
- entry->to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ entry->to = regset[idx].brbtgt;
}
capture_brbe_flags(entry, event, brbinf);
- return true;
+}
+
+static void process_branch_entries(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct brbe_regset *regset, int nr_regset)
+{
+ int idx;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < nr_regset; idx++)
+ brbe_regset_branch_entries(cpuc, event, regset, idx);
+
+ cpuc->branches->branch_stack.nr = nr_regset;
+ cpuc->branches->branch_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL;
}
void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
{
struct brbe_hw_attr *brbe_attr = (struct brbe_hw_attr *)cpuc->percpu_pmu->private;
+ struct arm64_perf_task_context *task_ctx = event->pmu_ctx->task_ctx_data;
+ struct brbe_regset live[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
+ int nr_live, nr_store;
u64 brbfcr, brbcr;
- int idx, loop1_idx1, loop1_idx2, loop2_idx1, loop2_idx2, count;
brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
@@ -739,35 +743,16 @@ void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
write_sysreg_s(brbfcr | BRBFCR_EL1_PAUSED, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
isb();
- /* Determine the indices for each loop */
- loop1_idx1 = BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MIN;
- if (brbe_attr->brbe_nr <= BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES) {
- loop1_idx2 = brbe_attr->brbe_nr - 1;
- loop2_idx1 = BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MIN;
- loop2_idx2 = BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX;
+ nr_live = capture_brbe_regset(brbe_attr, live);
+ if (event->ctx->task) {
+ nr_store = task_ctx->nr_brbe_records;
+ nr_store = stitch_stored_live_entries(task_ctx->store, live, nr_store,
+ nr_live, brbe_attr->brbe_nr);
+ process_branch_entries(cpuc, event, task_ctx->store, nr_store);
+ task_ctx->nr_brbe_records = 0;
} else {
- loop1_idx2 = BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX;
- loop2_idx1 = BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MIN;
- loop2_idx2 = brbe_attr->brbe_nr - 1;
- }
-
- /* Loop through bank 0 */
- select_brbe_bank(BRBE_BANK_IDX_0);
- for (idx = 0, count = loop1_idx1; count <= loop1_idx2; idx++, count++) {
- if (!capture_branch_entry(cpuc, event, idx))
- goto skip_bank_1;
- }
-
- /* Loop through bank 1 */
- select_brbe_bank(BRBE_BANK_IDX_1);
- for (count = loop2_idx1; count <= loop2_idx2; idx++, count++) {
- if (!capture_branch_entry(cpuc, event, idx))
- break;
+ process_branch_entries(cpuc, event, live, nr_live);
}
-
-skip_bank_1:
- cpuc->branches->branch_stack.nr = idx;
- cpuc->branches->branch_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL;
process_branch_aborts(cpuc);
/* Unpause the buffer */
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 4:04 [PATCH V11 00/10] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 01/10] drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Add new sched_task() callback Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 7:26 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 02/10] arm64/perf: Add BRBE registers and fields Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 7:55 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-06 4:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-13 16:27 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-14 2:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 03/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in struct arm_pmu Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 7:58 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-06 4:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 04/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in struct pmu_hw_events Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 8:00 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 05/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-02 2:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-06-05 2:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 12:05 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-06 10:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-06 10:41 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-08 10:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-06-09 4:00 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-09 9:54 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-06-09 7:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 06/10] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack events via FEAT_BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-02 1:45 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-06-05 3:00 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 13:43 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-09 4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-09 12:37 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-09 4:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-09 12:42 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-09 5:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-09 12:47 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-09 13:15 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-12 8:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-09 13:34 ` James Clark
2023-06-12 10:12 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 07/10] arm64/perf: Add PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA to events with has_branch_stack() Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 08/10] arm64/perf: Add struct brbe_regset helper functions Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-02 2:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-06-05 3:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-05 23:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-06-13 17:17 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-14 5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-06-14 10:59 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-31 4:04 ` [PATCH V11 09/10] arm64/perf: Implement branch records save on task sched out Anshuman Khandual
2023-05-31 4:04 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2023-06-09 11:13 ` [PATCH V11 00/10] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230531040428.501523-11-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).