From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf pmus: Add scan that ignores duplicates, use for perf list
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:49:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230810214952.2934029-3-irogers@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810214952.2934029-1-irogers@google.com>
When there are multiple PMUs that differ only by suffix, by default
just list the first one and skip all others. As the PMUs are sorted,
the scan routine checks that the PMU names match and the numbers are
consecutive. If "-v" is passed to "perf list" then list all PMUs.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-list.c | 8 +++++
tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/print-events.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c b/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
index 7fec2cca759f..8fe4ddf02c14 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
@@ -423,6 +423,13 @@ static void json_print_metric(void *ps __maybe_unused, const char *group,
strbuf_release(&buf);
}
+static bool default_skip_duplicate_pmus(void *ps)
+{
+ struct print_state *print_state = ps;
+
+ return !print_state->long_desc;
+}
+
int cmd_list(int argc, const char **argv)
{
int i, ret = 0;
@@ -434,6 +441,7 @@ int cmd_list(int argc, const char **argv)
.print_end = default_print_end,
.print_event = default_print_event,
.print_metric = default_print_metric,
+ .skip_duplicate_pmus = default_skip_duplicate_pmus,
};
const char *cputype = NULL;
const char *unit_name = NULL;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
index 3581710667b0..5073843aca19 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
@@ -275,6 +275,50 @@ struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_core(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
return NULL;
}
+static struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_skip_duplicates(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ bool use_core_pmus = !pmu || pmu->is_core;
+ int last_pmu_name_len = 0;
+ unsigned long last_pmu_num = 0;
+ const char *last_pmu_name = (pmu && pmu->name) ? pmu->name : "";
+
+ if (!pmu) {
+ pmu_read_sysfs(/*core_only=*/false);
+ pmu = list_prepare_entry(pmu, &core_pmus, list);
+ } else
+ last_pmu_name_len = pmu_name_len_no_suffix(pmu->name ?: "", &last_pmu_num);
+
+ if (use_core_pmus) {
+ list_for_each_entry_continue(pmu, &core_pmus, list) {
+ unsigned long pmu_num = 0;
+ int pmu_name_len = pmu_name_len_no_suffix(pmu->name ?: "", &pmu_num);
+
+ if (last_pmu_name_len == pmu_name_len &&
+ (last_pmu_num + 1 == pmu_num) &&
+ !strncmp(last_pmu_name, pmu->name ?: "", pmu_name_len)) {
+ last_pmu_num++;
+ continue;
+ }
+ return pmu;
+ }
+ pmu = NULL;
+ pmu = list_prepare_entry(pmu, &other_pmus, list);
+ }
+ list_for_each_entry_continue(pmu, &other_pmus, list) {
+ unsigned long pmu_num = 0;
+ int pmu_name_len = pmu_name_len_no_suffix(pmu->name ?: "", &pmu_num);
+
+ if (last_pmu_name_len == pmu_name_len &&
+ (last_pmu_num + 1 == pmu_num) &&
+ !strncmp(last_pmu_name, pmu->name ?: "", pmu_name_len)) {
+ last_pmu_num++;
+ continue;
+ }
+ return pmu;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
const struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__pmu_for_pmu_filter(const char *str)
{
struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
@@ -429,10 +473,16 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
int printed = 0;
int len, j;
struct sevent *aliases;
+ struct perf_pmu *(*scan_fn)(struct perf_pmu *);
+
+ if (print_cb->skip_duplicate_pmus(print_state))
+ scan_fn = perf_pmus__scan_skip_duplicates;
+ else
+ scan_fn = perf_pmus__scan;
pmu = NULL;
len = 0;
- while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
+ while ((pmu = scan_fn(pmu)) != NULL) {
list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->aliases, list)
len++;
if (pmu->selectable)
@@ -445,7 +495,7 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
}
pmu = NULL;
j = 0;
- while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
+ while ((pmu = scan_fn(pmu)) != NULL) {
bool is_cpu = pmu->is_core;
list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->aliases, list) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/print-events.h b/tools/perf/util/print-events.h
index d7fab411e75c..bf4290bef0cd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/print-events.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/print-events.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct print_callbacks {
const char *expr,
const char *threshold,
const char *unit);
+ bool (*skip_duplicate_pmus)(void *print_state);
};
/** Print all events, the default when no options are specified. */
--
2.41.0.640.ga95def55d0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 21:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] perf list: Remove duplicate PMUs Ian Rogers
2023-08-10 21:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf pmus: Sort pmus by name then suffix Ian Rogers
2023-08-11 13:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-08-11 15:19 ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-11 15:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-08-11 13:59 ` John Garry
2023-08-11 15:15 ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-10 21:49 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2023-08-11 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf pmus: Add scan that ignores duplicates, use for perf list John Garry
2023-08-14 15:57 ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-14 16:09 ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-15 8:56 ` John Garry
2023-08-10 21:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] perf pmus: Don't print duplicate PMU suffix in list by default Ian Rogers
2023-08-11 15:53 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230810214952.2934029-3-irogers@google.com \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).