* [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand
@ 2023-09-20 19:28 Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel
The Problem
===========
Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of
perf version --build-options and greps, such as:
perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE"
Proposed solution
=================
As suggested by contributors in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/ZMPWk5K63tadmDlU@kernel.org/
Introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which
scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as:
perf check --feature HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT
or
perf check --feature libtraceevent
The usage of "perf version --build-options | grep" has been replaced in two
tests, with "perf check --feature" command
Also, to not duplicate the same feature list at multiple places, a new global
'supported_features' array has been introduced in builtin.h, so both commands
'perf check --feature' and 'perf version --build-options' use the same array
'supported_features' feature is an array of 'struct feature_support', which
also has the name of the feature, macro used to test it's presence, and a
is_builtin member, which will be 0 if feature not built-in, and 1 if built-in
Architectures Tested
====================
* x86_64
* ppc64le
Git tree
========
Git tree with this patch series applied for testing:
https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/linux/tree/perf-check-feature-v2
Changelog
=========
V2
+ improved the patch series with suggestions from Namhyung
+ fix incorrect return value, added -q option, and moved array definition to
perf-check.c
V1
+ changed subcommand name to 'perf check --feature'
+ added documentation for perf check
+ support both macro (eg. HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT), and name (eg. libtraceevent) as
input to 'perf check --feature'
+ change subject and descriptions of all patch mentioning perf check instead of
perf build
V0: Previous patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230825061125.24312-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/
Aditya Gupta (3):
perf check: introduce check subcommand
perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array
perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support
Athira Rajeev (1):
tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check
--feature
tools/perf/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt | 56 ++++++++
tools/perf/builtin-check.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/builtin-version.c | 39 ++----
tools/perf/builtin.h | 18 +++
tools/perf/perf.c | 1 +
.../perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh | 4 +-
.../shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 5 +-
.../shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh | 5 +-
tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 +-
10 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt
create mode 100644 tools/perf/builtin-check.c
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand
2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
@ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta
2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel
Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of
perf version --build-options and greps, such as:
perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE"
Instead of this, introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which
scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as:
perf check --feature HAVE_FEATURE
'perf check --feature' command is expected to have exit status of 1 if feature is
built-in, and 0 if not, -2 if feature is not known.
An array 'supported_features' has also been introduced that can be
used by other commands like 'perf version --build-options', so that
new features can be added in one place, with the array
Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt | 56 +++++++++++
tools/perf/builtin-check.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/builtin.h | 18 ++++
tools/perf/perf.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 204 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt
create mode 100644 tools/perf/builtin-check.c
diff --git a/tools/perf/Build b/tools/perf/Build
index aa7623622834..a55a797c1b5f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/Build
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
perf-y += builtin-bench.o
perf-y += builtin-annotate.o
+perf-y += builtin-check.o
perf-y += builtin-config.o
perf-y += builtin-diff.o
perf-y += builtin-evlist.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5cf6ab7df8c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+perf-check(1)
+===============
+
+NAME
+----
+perf-check - check features in perf
+
+SYNOPSIS
+--------
+'perf check' [-q] [--feature]
+
+DESCRIPTION
+-----------
+With no options given, the 'perf check' just prints the perf version
+on the standard output.
+
+If the option '--feature' is given, then status of feature is printed
+on the standard output, ie. whether it is compiled-in/built-in or not
+
+OPTIONS
+-------
+-q::
+ Do not print any messages or warnings
+
+--feature::
+ Print whether a feature is compiled-in or not. A feature name/macro is
+ required to be passed after this flag
+
+ Example Usage:
+ perf check --feature libtraceevent
+ perf check --feature HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT
+
+ Supported feature names/macro:
+ dwarf / HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
+ dwarf_getlocations / HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
+ libaudit / HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT
+ syscall_table / HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT
+ libbfd / HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
+ debuginfod / HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT
+ libelf / HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
+ libnuma / HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
+ numa_num_possible_cpus / HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
+ libperl / HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT
+ libpython / HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT
+ libslang / HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
+ libcrypto / HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT
+ libunwind / HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT
+ libdw-dwarf-unwind / HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
+ zlib / HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT
+ lzma / HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT
+ get_cpuid / HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
+ bpf / HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+ aio / HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
+ zstd / HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT
+ libpfm4 / HAVE_LIBPFM
+ libtraceevent / HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-check.c b/tools/perf/builtin-check.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..acd0cfe135d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-check.c
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "builtin.h"
+#include "color.h"
+#include "util/debug.h"
+#include "util/header.h"
+#include <tools/config.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
+
+struct check {
+ const char *feature;
+};
+
+static struct check check;
+
+static struct option check_options[] = {
+ OPT_STRING(0, "feature", &check.feature, NULL, "check if a feature is built in"),
+ OPT_BOOLEAN('q', "quiet", &quiet, "do not show any warnings or messages"),
+ OPT_END(),
+};
+
+static const char * const check_usage[] = {
+ "perf check [<options>]",
+ NULL
+};
+
+struct feature_support supported_features[] = {
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("dwarf", HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("dwarf_getlocations", HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libaudit", HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("syscall_table", HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libbfd", HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("debuginfod", HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libelf", HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libnuma", HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("numa_num_possible_cpus", HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libperl", HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libpython", HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libslang", HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libcrypto", HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libunwind", HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libdw-dwarf-unwind", HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("zlib", HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("lzma", HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("get_cpuid", HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("bpf", HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("aio", HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("zstd", HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libpfm4", HAVE_LIBPFM),
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT("libtraceevent", HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT),
+
+ // this should remain at end, to know the array end
+ FEATURE_SUPPORT(NULL, _)
+};
+
+static void on_off_print(const char *status)
+{
+ printf("[ ");
+
+ if (!strcmp(status, "OFF"))
+ color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "%-3s", status);
+ else
+ color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_GREEN, "%-3s", status);
+
+ printf(" ]");
+}
+
+static void status_print(const char *name, const char *macro,
+ const char *status)
+{
+ printf("%22s: ", name);
+ on_off_print(status);
+ printf(" # %s\n", macro);
+}
+
+#define STATUS(feature) \
+do { \
+ if (feature.is_builtin) \
+ status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "on"); \
+ else \
+ status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "OFF"); \
+} while (0)
+
+/**
+ * check whether "feature" is built-in with perf
+ * returns:
+ * -1: Feature not known
+ * 0: Built-in
+ * 1: NOT Built in
+ */
+static int has_support(const char *feature)
+{
+ int res = -1;
+
+ for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) {
+ if ((strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].name) == 0) ||
+ (strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].macro) == 0)) {
+ res = supported_features[i].is_builtin;
+ if (!quiet)
+ STATUS(supported_features[i]);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (res == -1) {
+ if (!quiet)
+ color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "Feature not known: %s", feature);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return !res;
+}
+
+int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+ argc = parse_options(argc, argv, check_options, check_usage,
+ PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
+
+ if (!quiet)
+ printf("perf check %s\n", perf_version_string);
+
+ if (check.feature)
+ return has_support(check.feature);
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin.h b/tools/perf/builtin.h
index f2ab5bae2150..9f895981bc9e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin.h
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin.h
@@ -2,6 +2,23 @@
#ifndef BUILTIN_H
#define BUILTIN_H
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <tools/config.h>
+
+struct feature_support {
+ const char *name;
+ const char *macro;
+ int is_builtin;
+};
+
+#define FEATURE_SUPPORT(name_, macro_) { \
+ .name = name_, \
+ .macro = #macro_, \
+ .is_builtin = IS_BUILTIN(macro_) }
+
+extern struct feature_support supported_features[];
+
void list_common_cmds_help(void);
const char *help_unknown_cmd(const char *cmd);
@@ -9,6 +26,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv);
int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv);
int cmd_buildid_cache(int argc, const char **argv);
int cmd_buildid_list(int argc, const char **argv);
+int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv);
int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv);
int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv);
int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv);
diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
index d3fc8090413c..83dc0ac42fdb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/perf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = {
{ "archive", NULL, 0 },
{ "buildid-cache", cmd_buildid_cache, 0 },
{ "buildid-list", cmd_buildid_list, 0 },
+ { "check", cmd_check, 0 },
{ "config", cmd_config, 0 },
{ "c2c", cmd_c2c, 0 },
{ "diff", cmd_diff, 0 },
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array
2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta
@ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature Aditya Gupta
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel
Now that the feature list has been duplicated in a global
'supported_features' array, use that array instead of manually checking
status of built-in features.
This helps in being consistent with commands such as 'perf check --feature',
so commands can use the same array, and any new feature can be added at
one place, in the 'supported_features' array
Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-version.c | 39 ++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
index e5859c70e195..e149d96c6dc5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c
@@ -46,41 +46,18 @@ static void status_print(const char *name, const char *macro,
printf(" # %s\n", macro);
}
-#define STATUS(__d, __m) \
-do { \
- if (IS_BUILTIN(__d)) \
- status_print(#__m, #__d, "on"); \
- else \
- status_print(#__m, #__d, "OFF"); \
+#define STATUS(feature) \
+do { \
+ if (feature.is_builtin) \
+ status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "on"); \
+ else \
+ status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "OFF"); \
} while (0)
static void library_status(void)
{
- STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT, dwarf);
- STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT, dwarf_getlocations);
-#ifndef HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT, libaudit);
-#endif
- STATUS(HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT, syscall_table);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT, libbfd);
- STATUS(HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT, debuginfod);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT, libelf);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT, libnuma);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT, numa_num_possible_cpus);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT, libperl);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT, libpython);
- STATUS(HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT, libslang);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT, libcrypto);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT, libunwind);
- STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT, libdw-dwarf-unwind);
- STATUS(HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT, zlib);
- STATUS(HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT, lzma);
- STATUS(HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT, get_cpuid);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT, bpf);
- STATUS(HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT, aio);
- STATUS(HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT, zstd);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBPFM, libpfm4);
- STATUS(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT, libtraceevent);
+ for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i)
+ STATUS(supported_features[i]);
}
int cmd_version(int argc, const char **argv)
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support
2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta
@ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature Aditya Gupta
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel
Currently we use output of 'perf version --build-options', to check whether
perf was built with libtraceevent support.
Instead, use 'perf check --feature libtraceevent' to check for
libtraceevent support.
Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
index 92d15154ba79..f4db68edb2e3 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ find_str_or_fail() {
# check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support
skip_no_probe_record_support() {
- perf version --build-options | grep -q " OFF .* HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" && return 2
- return 0
+ perf check -q --feature libtraceevent && return 0
+ return 2
}
prepare_perf_data() {
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature
2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta
@ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In probe_vfs_getname.sh, current we use "perf record --dry-run"
to check for libtraceevent and skip the test if perf is not
build with libtraceevent. Change the check to use "perf check --feature"
option
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh | 4 ++--
tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 5 ++++-
tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh | 5 ++++-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh
index bf4c1fb71c4b..368a55c02134 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ skip_if_no_debuginfo() {
# check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support
skip_no_probe_record_support() {
if [ $had_vfs_getname -eq 1 ] ; then
- perf record --dry-run -e $1 2>&1 | grep "libtraceevent is necessary for tracepoint support" && return 2
- return 1
+ perf check -q --feature libtraceevent && return 1
+ return 2
fi
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
index 89214a6d9951..0c00e94b83ff 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
@@ -58,7 +58,10 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
# Check presence of libtraceevent support to run perf record
skip_no_probe_record_support "$event_name/$eventattr/"
- [ $? -eq 2 ] && return 2
+ if [ $? -eq 2 ]; then
+ echo "WARN: Skipping test trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace. No libtraceevent support."
+ return 2
+ fi
perf record -e $event_name/$eventattr/ -o $perf_data ping -6 -c 1 ::1 > /dev/null 2>&1
# check if perf data file got created in above step.
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh
index 7f664f1889d9..c7416d21fc92 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh
@@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ record_open_file() {
echo "Recording open file:"
# Check presence of libtraceevent support to run perf record
skip_no_probe_record_support "probe:vfs_getname*"
- [ $? -eq 2 ] && return 2
+ if [ $? -eq 2 ]; then
+ echo "WARN: Skipping test record_open_file. No libtraceevent support"
+ return 2
+ fi
perf record -o ${perfdata} -e probe:vfs_getname\* touch $file
}
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta
@ 2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2023-09-27 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aditya Gupta
Cc: acme, jolsa, irogers, linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain,
disgoel
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:29 PM Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of
> perf version --build-options and greps, such as:
>
> perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE"
>
> Instead of this, introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which
> scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as:
>
> perf check --feature HAVE_FEATURE
>
> 'perf check --feature' command is expected to have exit status of 1 if feature is
> built-in, and 0 if not, -2 if feature is not known.
>
> An array 'supported_features' has also been introduced that can be
> used by other commands like 'perf version --build-options', so that
> new features can be added in one place, with the array
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
[SNIP]
> +/**
> + * check whether "feature" is built-in with perf
> + * returns:
> + * -1: Feature not known
> + * 0: Built-in
> + * 1: NOT Built in
It seems not intuitive. I'd return 1 if it's builtin.
Maybe we can return 0 for unknown ones too.
> + */
> +static int has_support(const char *feature)
> +{
> + int res = -1;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) {
> + if ((strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].name) == 0) ||
> + (strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].macro) == 0)) {
Please align it to the previous strcmp().
> + res = supported_features[i].is_builtin;
> + if (!quiet)
> + STATUS(supported_features[i]);
> + break;
Why not return right here?
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (res == -1) {
> + if (!quiet)
> + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "Feature not known: %s", feature);
> + return -1;
> + }
Then you don't even need the 'res' variable.
> +
> + return !res;
> +}
> +
> +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv)
> +{
> + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, check_options, check_usage,
> + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> +
> + if (!quiet)
> + printf("perf check %s\n", perf_version_string);
> +
> + if (check.feature)
> + return has_support(check.feature);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin.h b/tools/perf/builtin.h
> index f2ab5bae2150..9f895981bc9e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,23 @@
> #ifndef BUILTIN_H
> #define BUILTIN_H
>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <tools/config.h>
> +
> +struct feature_support {
> + const char *name;
> + const char *macro;
> + int is_builtin;
> +};
> +
> +#define FEATURE_SUPPORT(name_, macro_) { \
> + .name = name_, \
> + .macro = #macro_, \
> + .is_builtin = IS_BUILTIN(macro_) }
> +
> +extern struct feature_support supported_features[];
> +
> void list_common_cmds_help(void);
> const char *help_unknown_cmd(const char *cmd);
>
> @@ -9,6 +26,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv);
> int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv);
> int cmd_buildid_cache(int argc, const char **argv);
> int cmd_buildid_list(int argc, const char **argv);
> +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv);
> int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv);
> int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv);
> int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
> index d3fc8090413c..83dc0ac42fdb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = {
> { "archive", NULL, 0 },
> { "buildid-cache", cmd_buildid_cache, 0 },
> { "buildid-list", cmd_buildid_list, 0 },
> + { "check", cmd_check, 0 },
Please align this.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> { "config", cmd_config, 0 },
> { "c2c", cmd_c2c, 0 },
> { "diff", cmd_diff, 0 },
> --
> 2.41.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand
2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta
2023-09-28 4:10 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-27 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: acme, jolsa, irogers, linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain,
disgoel
Hi Namhyung,
Thanks for the reviews. Also, sorry for the delays in my replies.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:29:35PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:29 PM Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of
> > perf version --build-options and greps, such as:
> >
> > perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE"
> >
> > Instead of this, introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which
> > scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as:
> >
> > perf check --feature HAVE_FEATURE
> >
> > 'perf check --feature' command is expected to have exit status of 1 if feature is
> > built-in, and 0 if not, -2 if feature is not known.
> >
> > An array 'supported_features' has also been introduced that can be
> > used by other commands like 'perf version --build-options', so that
> > new features can be added in one place, with the array
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
>
> [SNIP]
> > +/**
> > + * check whether "feature" is built-in with perf
> > + * returns:
> > + * -1: Feature not known
> > + * 0: Built-in
> > + * 1: NOT Built in
>
> It seems not intuitive. I'd return 1 if it's builtin.
Yes, initially it used to return 1 (TRUE) if builtin, 0 if not (FALSE).
The idea was that scripts were using 'grep "HAVE_FEATURE" && return 1', so to
match the grep behaviour (if search is true, it returns 0), I changed it.
That said, I do agree with your intuitive point, will change it back in V3.
> Maybe we can return 0 for unknown ones too.
Sure, that also removes the need for 'res' as you suggested later.
>
> > + */
> > +static int has_support(const char *feature)
> > +{
> > + int res = -1;
> > +
> > + for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) {
> > + if ((strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].name) == 0) ||
> > + (strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].macro) == 0)) {
>
> Please align it to the previous strcmp().
Oh sorry, missed it as it was showing aligned for me (due to tab). Will align it
in V3.
>
>
> > + res = supported_features[i].is_builtin;
> > + if (!quiet)
> > + STATUS(supported_features[i]);
> > + break;
>
> Why not return right here?
Sure, can return here.
>
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (res == -1) {
> > + if (!quiet)
> > + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "Feature not known: %s", feature);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Then you don't even need the 'res' variable.
Yup, with the -1 and 0 both be 0, I will remove the 'res'.
>
> > +
> > + return !res;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv)
> > +{
> > + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, check_options, check_usage,
> > + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> > +
> > + if (!quiet)
> > + printf("perf check %s\n", perf_version_string);
> > +
> > + if (check.feature)
> > + return has_support(check.feature);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin.h b/tools/perf/builtin.h
> > index f2ab5bae2150..9f895981bc9e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin.h
> > @@ -2,6 +2,23 @@
> > #ifndef BUILTIN_H
> > #define BUILTIN_H
> >
> > +#include <stddef.h>
> > +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> > +#include <tools/config.h>
> > +
> > +struct feature_support {
> > + const char *name;
> > + const char *macro;
> > + int is_builtin;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define FEATURE_SUPPORT(name_, macro_) { \
> > + .name = name_, \
> > + .macro = #macro_, \
> > + .is_builtin = IS_BUILTIN(macro_) }
> > +
> > +extern struct feature_support supported_features[];
> > +
> > void list_common_cmds_help(void);
> > const char *help_unknown_cmd(const char *cmd);
> >
> > @@ -9,6 +26,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv);
> > int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv);
> > int cmd_buildid_cache(int argc, const char **argv);
> > int cmd_buildid_list(int argc, const char **argv);
> > +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv);
> > int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv);
> > int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv);
> > int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
> > index d3fc8090413c..83dc0ac42fdb 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
> > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = {
> > { "archive", NULL, 0 },
> > { "buildid-cache", cmd_buildid_cache, 0 },
> > { "buildid-list", cmd_buildid_list, 0 },
> > + { "check", cmd_check, 0 },
>
> Please align this.
It should be aligned, on my system it's showing one tab before this, as the
other lines also do, will align it in next version.
Also namhyung, I moved the definition of the 'supported_features' array to
builtin-check.c, and is also accessed in builtin-version.c does that seem good
to you ?
Thanks,
- Aditya Gupta
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> > { "config", cmd_config, 0 },
> > { "c2c", cmd_c2c, 0 },
> > { "diff", cmd_diff, 0 },
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand
2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta
@ 2023-09-28 4:10 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2023-09-28 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aditya Gupta
Cc: acme, jolsa, irogers, linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain,
disgoel
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:18 AM Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Also namhyung, I moved the definition of the 'supported_features' array to
> builtin-check.c, and is also accessed in builtin-version.c does that seem good
> to you ?
Yeah, I liked that part :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-28 4:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta
2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta
2023-09-28 4:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta
2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature Aditya Gupta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).