* [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand @ 2023-09-20 19:28 Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel The Problem =========== Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of perf version --build-options and greps, such as: perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE" Proposed solution ================= As suggested by contributors in: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/ZMPWk5K63tadmDlU@kernel.org/ Introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as: perf check --feature HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT or perf check --feature libtraceevent The usage of "perf version --build-options | grep" has been replaced in two tests, with "perf check --feature" command Also, to not duplicate the same feature list at multiple places, a new global 'supported_features' array has been introduced in builtin.h, so both commands 'perf check --feature' and 'perf version --build-options' use the same array 'supported_features' feature is an array of 'struct feature_support', which also has the name of the feature, macro used to test it's presence, and a is_builtin member, which will be 0 if feature not built-in, and 1 if built-in Architectures Tested ==================== * x86_64 * ppc64le Git tree ======== Git tree with this patch series applied for testing: https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/linux/tree/perf-check-feature-v2 Changelog ========= V2 + improved the patch series with suggestions from Namhyung + fix incorrect return value, added -q option, and moved array definition to perf-check.c V1 + changed subcommand name to 'perf check --feature' + added documentation for perf check + support both macro (eg. HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT), and name (eg. libtraceevent) as input to 'perf check --feature' + change subject and descriptions of all patch mentioning perf check instead of perf build V0: Previous patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230825061125.24312-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/ Aditya Gupta (3): perf check: introduce check subcommand perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Athira Rajeev (1): tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature tools/perf/Build | 1 + tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt | 56 ++++++++ tools/perf/builtin-check.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/builtin-version.c | 39 ++---- tools/perf/builtin.h | 18 +++ tools/perf/perf.c | 1 + .../perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh | 4 +- .../shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 5 +- .../shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh | 5 +- tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 +- 10 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt create mode 100644 tools/perf/builtin-check.c -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand 2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta 2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of perf version --build-options and greps, such as: perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE" Instead of this, introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as: perf check --feature HAVE_FEATURE 'perf check --feature' command is expected to have exit status of 1 if feature is built-in, and 0 if not, -2 if feature is not known. An array 'supported_features' has also been introduced that can be used by other commands like 'perf version --build-options', so that new features can be added in one place, with the array Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/Build | 1 + tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt | 56 +++++++++++ tools/perf/builtin-check.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/builtin.h | 18 ++++ tools/perf/perf.c | 1 + 5 files changed, 204 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt create mode 100644 tools/perf/builtin-check.c diff --git a/tools/perf/Build b/tools/perf/Build index aa7623622834..a55a797c1b5f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Build +++ b/tools/perf/Build @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ perf-y += builtin-bench.o perf-y += builtin-annotate.o +perf-y += builtin-check.o perf-y += builtin-config.o perf-y += builtin-diff.o perf-y += builtin-evlist.o diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5cf6ab7df8c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +perf-check(1) +=============== + +NAME +---- +perf-check - check features in perf + +SYNOPSIS +-------- +'perf check' [-q] [--feature] + +DESCRIPTION +----------- +With no options given, the 'perf check' just prints the perf version +on the standard output. + +If the option '--feature' is given, then status of feature is printed +on the standard output, ie. whether it is compiled-in/built-in or not + +OPTIONS +------- +-q:: + Do not print any messages or warnings + +--feature:: + Print whether a feature is compiled-in or not. A feature name/macro is + required to be passed after this flag + + Example Usage: + perf check --feature libtraceevent + perf check --feature HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT + + Supported feature names/macro: + dwarf / HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT + dwarf_getlocations / HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT + libaudit / HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT + syscall_table / HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT + libbfd / HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT + debuginfod / HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT + libelf / HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT + libnuma / HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT + numa_num_possible_cpus / HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT + libperl / HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT + libpython / HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT + libslang / HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT + libcrypto / HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT + libunwind / HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT + libdw-dwarf-unwind / HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT + zlib / HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT + lzma / HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT + get_cpuid / HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT + bpf / HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT + aio / HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT + zstd / HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT + libpfm4 / HAVE_LIBPFM + libtraceevent / HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-check.c b/tools/perf/builtin-check.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..acd0cfe135d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-check.c @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include "builtin.h" +#include "color.h" +#include "util/debug.h" +#include "util/header.h" +#include <tools/config.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <subcmd/parse-options.h> + +struct check { + const char *feature; +}; + +static struct check check; + +static struct option check_options[] = { + OPT_STRING(0, "feature", &check.feature, NULL, "check if a feature is built in"), + OPT_BOOLEAN('q', "quiet", &quiet, "do not show any warnings or messages"), + OPT_END(), +}; + +static const char * const check_usage[] = { + "perf check [<options>]", + NULL +}; + +struct feature_support supported_features[] = { + FEATURE_SUPPORT("dwarf", HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("dwarf_getlocations", HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libaudit", HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("syscall_table", HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libbfd", HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("debuginfod", HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libelf", HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libnuma", HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("numa_num_possible_cpus", HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libperl", HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libpython", HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libslang", HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libcrypto", HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libunwind", HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libdw-dwarf-unwind", HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("zlib", HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("lzma", HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("get_cpuid", HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("bpf", HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("aio", HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("zstd", HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libpfm4", HAVE_LIBPFM), + FEATURE_SUPPORT("libtraceevent", HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT), + + // this should remain at end, to know the array end + FEATURE_SUPPORT(NULL, _) +}; + +static void on_off_print(const char *status) +{ + printf("[ "); + + if (!strcmp(status, "OFF")) + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "%-3s", status); + else + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_GREEN, "%-3s", status); + + printf(" ]"); +} + +static void status_print(const char *name, const char *macro, + const char *status) +{ + printf("%22s: ", name); + on_off_print(status); + printf(" # %s\n", macro); +} + +#define STATUS(feature) \ +do { \ + if (feature.is_builtin) \ + status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "on"); \ + else \ + status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "OFF"); \ +} while (0) + +/** + * check whether "feature" is built-in with perf + * returns: + * -1: Feature not known + * 0: Built-in + * 1: NOT Built in + */ +static int has_support(const char *feature) +{ + int res = -1; + + for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) { + if ((strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].name) == 0) || + (strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].macro) == 0)) { + res = supported_features[i].is_builtin; + if (!quiet) + STATUS(supported_features[i]); + break; + } + } + + if (res == -1) { + if (!quiet) + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "Feature not known: %s", feature); + return -1; + } + + return !res; +} + +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv) +{ + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, check_options, check_usage, + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION); + + if (!quiet) + printf("perf check %s\n", perf_version_string); + + if (check.feature) + return has_support(check.feature); + + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin.h b/tools/perf/builtin.h index f2ab5bae2150..9f895981bc9e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin.h +++ b/tools/perf/builtin.h @@ -2,6 +2,23 @@ #ifndef BUILTIN_H #define BUILTIN_H +#include <stddef.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> +#include <tools/config.h> + +struct feature_support { + const char *name; + const char *macro; + int is_builtin; +}; + +#define FEATURE_SUPPORT(name_, macro_) { \ + .name = name_, \ + .macro = #macro_, \ + .is_builtin = IS_BUILTIN(macro_) } + +extern struct feature_support supported_features[]; + void list_common_cmds_help(void); const char *help_unknown_cmd(const char *cmd); @@ -9,6 +26,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv); int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv); int cmd_buildid_cache(int argc, const char **argv); int cmd_buildid_list(int argc, const char **argv); +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv); int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv); int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv); int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv); diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c index d3fc8090413c..83dc0ac42fdb 100644 --- a/tools/perf/perf.c +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = { { "archive", NULL, 0 }, { "buildid-cache", cmd_buildid_cache, 0 }, { "buildid-list", cmd_buildid_list, 0 }, + { "check", cmd_check, 0 }, { "config", cmd_config, 0 }, { "c2c", cmd_c2c, 0 }, { "diff", cmd_diff, 0 }, -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim 2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2023-09-27 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aditya Gupta Cc: acme, jolsa, irogers, linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel Hello, On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:29 PM Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of > perf version --build-options and greps, such as: > > perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE" > > Instead of this, introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which > scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as: > > perf check --feature HAVE_FEATURE > > 'perf check --feature' command is expected to have exit status of 1 if feature is > built-in, and 0 if not, -2 if feature is not known. > > An array 'supported_features' has also been introduced that can be > used by other commands like 'perf version --build-options', so that > new features can be added in one place, with the array > > Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> > --- [SNIP] > +/** > + * check whether "feature" is built-in with perf > + * returns: > + * -1: Feature not known > + * 0: Built-in > + * 1: NOT Built in It seems not intuitive. I'd return 1 if it's builtin. Maybe we can return 0 for unknown ones too. > + */ > +static int has_support(const char *feature) > +{ > + int res = -1; > + > + for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) { > + if ((strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].name) == 0) || > + (strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].macro) == 0)) { Please align it to the previous strcmp(). > + res = supported_features[i].is_builtin; > + if (!quiet) > + STATUS(supported_features[i]); > + break; Why not return right here? > + } > + } > + > + if (res == -1) { > + if (!quiet) > + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "Feature not known: %s", feature); > + return -1; > + } Then you don't even need the 'res' variable. > + > + return !res; > +} > + > +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv) > +{ > + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, check_options, check_usage, > + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION); > + > + if (!quiet) > + printf("perf check %s\n", perf_version_string); > + > + if (check.feature) > + return has_support(check.feature); > + > + return 0; > +} > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin.h b/tools/perf/builtin.h > index f2ab5bae2150..9f895981bc9e 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin.h > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin.h > @@ -2,6 +2,23 @@ > #ifndef BUILTIN_H > #define BUILTIN_H > > +#include <stddef.h> > +#include <linux/compiler.h> > +#include <tools/config.h> > + > +struct feature_support { > + const char *name; > + const char *macro; > + int is_builtin; > +}; > + > +#define FEATURE_SUPPORT(name_, macro_) { \ > + .name = name_, \ > + .macro = #macro_, \ > + .is_builtin = IS_BUILTIN(macro_) } > + > +extern struct feature_support supported_features[]; > + > void list_common_cmds_help(void); > const char *help_unknown_cmd(const char *cmd); > > @@ -9,6 +26,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv); > int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv); > int cmd_buildid_cache(int argc, const char **argv); > int cmd_buildid_list(int argc, const char **argv); > +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv); > int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv); > int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv); > int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv); > diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c > index d3fc8090413c..83dc0ac42fdb 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c > +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = { > { "archive", NULL, 0 }, > { "buildid-cache", cmd_buildid_cache, 0 }, > { "buildid-list", cmd_buildid_list, 0 }, > + { "check", cmd_check, 0 }, Please align this. Thanks, Namhyung > { "config", cmd_config, 0 }, > { "c2c", cmd_c2c, 0 }, > { "diff", cmd_diff, 0 }, > -- > 2.41.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand 2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta 2023-09-28 4:10 ` Namhyung Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-27 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namhyung Kim Cc: acme, jolsa, irogers, linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel Hi Namhyung, Thanks for the reviews. Also, sorry for the delays in my replies. On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:29:35PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:29 PM Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of > > perf version --build-options and greps, such as: > > > > perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE" > > > > Instead of this, introduce a subcommand "perf check --feature", with which > > scripts can test for presence of a feature, such as: > > > > perf check --feature HAVE_FEATURE > > > > 'perf check --feature' command is expected to have exit status of 1 if feature is > > built-in, and 0 if not, -2 if feature is not known. > > > > An array 'supported_features' has also been introduced that can be > > used by other commands like 'perf version --build-options', so that > > new features can be added in one place, with the array > > > > Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> > > --- > > [SNIP] > > +/** > > + * check whether "feature" is built-in with perf > > + * returns: > > + * -1: Feature not known > > + * 0: Built-in > > + * 1: NOT Built in > > It seems not intuitive. I'd return 1 if it's builtin. Yes, initially it used to return 1 (TRUE) if builtin, 0 if not (FALSE). The idea was that scripts were using 'grep "HAVE_FEATURE" && return 1', so to match the grep behaviour (if search is true, it returns 0), I changed it. That said, I do agree with your intuitive point, will change it back in V3. > Maybe we can return 0 for unknown ones too. Sure, that also removes the need for 'res' as you suggested later. > > > + */ > > +static int has_support(const char *feature) > > +{ > > + int res = -1; > > + > > + for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) { > > + if ((strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].name) == 0) || > > + (strcmp(feature, supported_features[i].macro) == 0)) { > > Please align it to the previous strcmp(). Oh sorry, missed it as it was showing aligned for me (due to tab). Will align it in V3. > > > > + res = supported_features[i].is_builtin; > > + if (!quiet) > > + STATUS(supported_features[i]); > > + break; > > Why not return right here? Sure, can return here. > > > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (res == -1) { > > + if (!quiet) > > + color_fprintf(stdout, PERF_COLOR_RED, "Feature not known: %s", feature); > > + return -1; > > + } > > Then you don't even need the 'res' variable. Yup, with the -1 and 0 both be 0, I will remove the 'res'. > > > + > > + return !res; > > +} > > + > > +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv) > > +{ > > + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, check_options, check_usage, > > + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION); > > + > > + if (!quiet) > > + printf("perf check %s\n", perf_version_string); > > + > > + if (check.feature) > > + return has_support(check.feature); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin.h b/tools/perf/builtin.h > > index f2ab5bae2150..9f895981bc9e 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin.h > > @@ -2,6 +2,23 @@ > > #ifndef BUILTIN_H > > #define BUILTIN_H > > > > +#include <stddef.h> > > +#include <linux/compiler.h> > > +#include <tools/config.h> > > + > > +struct feature_support { > > + const char *name; > > + const char *macro; > > + int is_builtin; > > +}; > > + > > +#define FEATURE_SUPPORT(name_, macro_) { \ > > + .name = name_, \ > > + .macro = #macro_, \ > > + .is_builtin = IS_BUILTIN(macro_) } > > + > > +extern struct feature_support supported_features[]; > > + > > void list_common_cmds_help(void); > > const char *help_unknown_cmd(const char *cmd); > > > > @@ -9,6 +26,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv); > > int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv); > > int cmd_buildid_cache(int argc, const char **argv); > > int cmd_buildid_list(int argc, const char **argv); > > +int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv); > > int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv); > > int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv); > > int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv); > > diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c > > index d3fc8090413c..83dc0ac42fdb 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static struct cmd_struct commands[] = { > > { "archive", NULL, 0 }, > > { "buildid-cache", cmd_buildid_cache, 0 }, > > { "buildid-list", cmd_buildid_list, 0 }, > > + { "check", cmd_check, 0 }, > > Please align this. It should be aligned, on my system it's showing one tab before this, as the other lines also do, will align it in next version. Also namhyung, I moved the definition of the 'supported_features' array to builtin-check.c, and is also accessed in builtin-version.c does that seem good to you ? Thanks, - Aditya Gupta > > Thanks, > Namhyung > > > > { "config", cmd_config, 0 }, > > { "c2c", cmd_c2c, 0 }, > > { "diff", cmd_diff, 0 }, > > -- > > 2.41.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand 2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-28 4:10 ` Namhyung Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2023-09-28 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aditya Gupta Cc: acme, jolsa, irogers, linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:18 AM Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Also namhyung, I moved the definition of the 'supported_features' array to > builtin-check.c, and is also accessed in builtin-version.c does that seem good > to you ? Yeah, I liked that part :) Thanks, Namhyung ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array 2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature Aditya Gupta 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel Now that the feature list has been duplicated in a global 'supported_features' array, use that array instead of manually checking status of built-in features. This helps in being consistent with commands such as 'perf check --feature', so commands can use the same array, and any new feature can be added at one place, in the 'supported_features' array Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/builtin-version.c | 39 ++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c index e5859c70e195..e149d96c6dc5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-version.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-version.c @@ -46,41 +46,18 @@ static void status_print(const char *name, const char *macro, printf(" # %s\n", macro); } -#define STATUS(__d, __m) \ -do { \ - if (IS_BUILTIN(__d)) \ - status_print(#__m, #__d, "on"); \ - else \ - status_print(#__m, #__d, "OFF"); \ +#define STATUS(feature) \ +do { \ + if (feature.is_builtin) \ + status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "on"); \ + else \ + status_print(feature.name, feature.macro, "OFF"); \ } while (0) static void library_status(void) { - STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT, dwarf); - STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT, dwarf_getlocations); -#ifndef HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT - STATUS(HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT, libaudit); -#endif - STATUS(HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT, syscall_table); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT, libbfd); - STATUS(HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT, debuginfod); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT, libelf); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT, libnuma); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT, numa_num_possible_cpus); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT, libperl); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT, libpython); - STATUS(HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT, libslang); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT, libcrypto); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT, libunwind); - STATUS(HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT, libdw-dwarf-unwind); - STATUS(HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT, zlib); - STATUS(HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT, lzma); - STATUS(HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT, get_cpuid); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT, bpf); - STATUS(HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT, aio); - STATUS(HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT, zstd); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBPFM, libpfm4); - STATUS(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT, libtraceevent); + for (int i = 0; supported_features[i].name; ++i) + STATUS(supported_features[i]); } int cmd_version(int argc, const char **argv) -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support 2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature Aditya Gupta 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel Currently we use output of 'perf version --build-options', to check whether perf was built with libtraceevent support. Instead, use 'perf check --feature libtraceevent' to check for libtraceevent support. Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh index 92d15154ba79..f4db68edb2e3 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ find_str_or_fail() { # check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support skip_no_probe_record_support() { - perf version --build-options | grep -q " OFF .* HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" && return 2 - return 0 + perf check -q --feature libtraceevent && return 0 + return 2 } prepare_perf_data() { -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature 2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 ` Aditya Gupta 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aditya Gupta @ 2023-09-20 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme, jolsa, irogers, namhyung Cc: linux-perf-users, maddy, atrajeev, kjain, disgoel From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In probe_vfs_getname.sh, current we use "perf record --dry-run" to check for libtraceevent and skip the test if perf is not build with libtraceevent. Change the check to use "perf check --feature" option Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh | 4 ++-- tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 5 ++++- tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh | 5 ++++- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh index bf4c1fb71c4b..368a55c02134 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ skip_if_no_debuginfo() { # check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support skip_no_probe_record_support() { if [ $had_vfs_getname -eq 1 ] ; then - perf record --dry-run -e $1 2>&1 | grep "libtraceevent is necessary for tracepoint support" && return 2 - return 1 + perf check -q --feature libtraceevent && return 1 + return 2 fi } diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh index 89214a6d9951..0c00e94b83ff 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh @@ -58,7 +58,10 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() { # Check presence of libtraceevent support to run perf record skip_no_probe_record_support "$event_name/$eventattr/" - [ $? -eq 2 ] && return 2 + if [ $? -eq 2 ]; then + echo "WARN: Skipping test trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace. No libtraceevent support." + return 2 + fi perf record -e $event_name/$eventattr/ -o $perf_data ping -6 -c 1 ::1 > /dev/null 2>&1 # check if perf data file got created in above step. diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh index 7f664f1889d9..c7416d21fc92 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh @@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ record_open_file() { echo "Recording open file:" # Check presence of libtraceevent support to run perf record skip_no_probe_record_support "probe:vfs_getname*" - [ $? -eq 2 ] && return 2 + if [ $? -eq 2 ]; then + echo "WARN: Skipping test record_open_file. No libtraceevent support" + return 2 + fi perf record -o ${perfdata} -e probe:vfs_getname\* touch $file } -- 2.41.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-28 4:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-09-20 19:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta 2023-09-27 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim 2023-09-27 10:03 ` Aditya Gupta 2023-09-28 4:10 ` Namhyung Kim 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta 2023-09-20 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check --feature Aditya Gupta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).