From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016C43FB18 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 19:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="M6QeXN2B" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DDEE5; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 12:06:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1696532793; x=1728068793; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=uzxlgwZ8x82LLBnZJSRnVgezJ3VH2Oj0pq6ma9njLKg=; b=M6QeXN2BAP3+PlLzrPkQADIWKOqpGL5h9tKExZ5pZvoLuF0dDtVrcnrM t5DwyEqYcAYhjNkGL5zvP/oC+Qp1psE40YAG8mzhOLA7GVDsiwCahKpHU uhFIIO/aHEDp/YB4RjdPuv1xlwDiPB2ch9x2uJif0OvAJzz0ayTvZHK66 Y+l3wABxr4haUmOCNJyLk5GvPu+wlgWtfnRzjVFYY5R9P6eSyeCKtnRhG M3zbv7XFddQhXfB/MXLm7LWlk8cxvmJGzChqR5fPcgndm8mMBmSt3Z1S+ Y1NISb5YLksLr8s5q6H7DhUC6VDZp2Kjf0gvDGm2uv25L/QMP31axzae4 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10854"; a="383488218" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,203,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="383488218" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2023 12:05:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10854"; a="999055066" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,203,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="999055066" Received: from ahunter6-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO ahunter-VirtualBox.home\044ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.249.35.8]) by fmsmga006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2023 12:05:08 -0700 From: Adrian Hunter To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/5] perf intel-pt: Use of get_unaligned_le16() etc Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 22:04:46 +0300 Message-Id: <20231005190451.175568-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Hi Ian sent a patch for this, but using get_unaligned_le16() etc seems nicer. Adrian Hunter (5): perf tools: Add get_unaligned_leNN() perf intel-pt: Simplify intel_pt_get_vmcs() perf intel-pt: Use existing definitions of le16_to_cpu() etc perf intel-pt: Use of get_unaligned_le16() etc perf intel-pt: Prefer get_unaligned_le64 to memcpy_le64 tools/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h | 20 ++++++++++ .../util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c | 43 +++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) Regards Adrian