linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] perf lock contention: Check race in tstamp elem creation
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:47:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231020204741.1869520-2-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020204741.1869520-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

When pelem is NULL, it'd create a new entry with zero data.  But it
might be preempted by IRQ/NMI just before calling bpf_map_update_elem()
then there's a chance to call it twice for the same pid.  So it'd be
better to use BPF_NOEXIST flag and check the return value to prevent
the race.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
index b11179452e19..69d31fd77cd0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
@@ -328,7 +328,11 @@ int contention_begin(u64 *ctx)
 	if (pelem == NULL) {
 		struct tstamp_data zero = {};
 
-		bpf_map_update_elem(&tstamp, &pid, &zero, BPF_ANY);
+		if (bpf_map_update_elem(&tstamp, &pid, &zero, BPF_NOEXIST) < 0) {
+			__sync_fetch_and_add(&task_fail, 1);
+			return 0;
+		}
+
 		pelem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&tstamp, &pid);
 		if (pelem == NULL) {
 			__sync_fetch_and_add(&task_fail, 1);
-- 
2.42.0.655.g421f12c284-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-20 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-20 20:47 [PATCH v3 1/3] perf lock contention: Clear lock addr after use Namhyung Kim
2023-10-20 20:47 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2023-10-25  4:13   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf lock contention: Check race in tstamp elem creation Ian Rogers
2023-10-20 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf lock contention: Use per-cpu array map for spinlocks Namhyung Kim
2023-10-25  4:15   ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-25  4:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf lock contention: Clear lock addr after use Ian Rogers
2023-10-26 17:11 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231020204741.1869520-2-namhyung@kernel.org \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).