From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT.
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 16:59:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311155927.sbWzLN62@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ze7eKgdajyEgQcpL@elver.google.com>
On 2024-03-11 11:34:18 [+0100], Marco Elver wrote:
> Unfortunately there's a bug in it somewhere. It can be reproduced with
> tools/testing/selftests/perf_events/remove_on_exec.
>
> (FWIW, the kselftests in that directory are more aggressive test cases
> that I never figured out how to properly port to the 'perf test'
> framework: sigtrap_threads is a more aggressive version of the 'sigtrap'
> perf test, and remove_on_exec has no perf test counterpart.)
You posted to warnings, I can only reproduce the second one. Based on the
backtrace it is obvious what happens and I dare to say that I know why…
Let me try address them.
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 17:51 [PATCH 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-08 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: Move irq_work_queue() where the event is prepared Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-08 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-08 17:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-08 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Split __perf_pending_irq() out of perf_pending_irq() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-11 10:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Marco Elver
2024-03-11 15:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-03-11 16:31 ` Marco Elver
2024-03-11 22:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240311155927.sbWzLN62@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).