From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Chaitanya S Prakash <ChaitanyaS.Prakash@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
james.clark@arm.com,
Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 8/8] perf test: Check output of the probe ... --funcs command
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:09:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240409080902.6f2ccd1239c64ca49861d6d6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408062230.1949882-9-ChaitanyaS.Prakash@arm.com>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 11:52:30 +0530
Chaitanya S Prakash <ChaitanyaS.Prakash@arm.com> wrote:
> From: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
>
> Test "perf probe of function from different CU" only checks if the perf
> command has failed and doesn't test the --funcs output. In the issue
> reported in the previous commit, the garbage output of the --funcs
> command was being ignored by the test when it could have been caught.
>
> An additional check to grep for "foo" has been added to test the --funcs
> output.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh
> index 319f36ebb9a4..82bc774a078a 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ gcc -g -Og -flto -c ${temp_dir}/testfile-foo.c -o ${temp_dir}/testfile-foo.o
> gcc -g -Og -c ${temp_dir}/testfile-main.c -o ${temp_dir}/testfile-main.o
> gcc -g -Og -o ${temp_dir}/testfile ${temp_dir}/testfile-foo.o ${temp_dir}/testfile-main.o
>
> -perf probe -x ${temp_dir}/testfile --funcs foo
> +perf probe -x ${temp_dir}/testfile --funcs foo | grep "foo"
> perf probe -x ${temp_dir}/testfile foo
>
> cleanup
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 6:22 [PATCH V2 0/8] perf tools: Fix test "perf probe of function from different CU" Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] tools lib: adopt str_has_suffix() from bpftool/gen.c Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 23:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-11 12:15 ` Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-11 15:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] perf util: Delete ends_with() and replace its use with str_has_suffix() Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] perf util: Replace an instance of strtailcmp() by str_has_suffix() Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 23:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] tools lib: Adopt str_has_prefix() from kernel Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 23:33 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] tools: Delete strstarts() and replace its usage with str_has_prefix() Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-18 7:32 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] perf tools: Enable configs required for test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 23:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-16 21:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] perf tools: Only treat files as map files when they have the extension .map Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-09 10:21 ` James Clark
2024-04-08 6:22 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] perf test: Check output of the probe ... --funcs command Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-08 23:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2024-04-16 21:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-17 18:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-23 11:53 ` Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-09 5:32 ` [PATCH V2 0/8] perf tools: Fix test "perf probe of function from different CU" Alexey Dobriyan
2024-04-11 12:10 ` Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-14 11:41 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2024-04-17 13:24 ` James Clark
2024-04-17 13:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-10 3:34 ` Chaitanya S Prakash
2024-04-11 18:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240409080902.6f2ccd1239c64ca49861d6d6@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=ChaitanyaS.Prakash@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).