linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
To: Kyle Huey <khuey@kylehuey.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/7] perf/bpf: Remove unneeded uses_default_overflow_handler()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:50:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412015019.7060-6-khuey@kylehuey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412015019.7060-1-khuey@kylehuey.com>

Now that struct perf_event's orig_overflow_handler is gone, there's no need
for the functions and macros to support looking past overflow_handler to
orig_overflow_handler.

This patch is solely a refactoring and results in no behavior change.

Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@kylehuey.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c   |  8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c |  4 ++--
 include/linux/perf_event.h        | 17 +++--------------
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index dc0fb7a81371..054e9199f30d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
 	hw->address &= ~alignment_mask;
 	hw->ctrl.len <<= offset;
 
-	if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp)) {
+	if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp)) {
 		/*
 		 * Mismatch breakpoints are required for single-stepping
 		 * breakpoints.
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
 		 * Otherwise, insert a temporary mismatch breakpoint so that
 		 * we can single-step over the watchpoint trigger.
 		 */
-		if (!uses_default_overflow_handler(wp))
+		if (!is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
 			continue;
 step:
 		enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
 		info->trigger = addr;
 		pr_debug("watchpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", info->trigger);
 		perf_bp_event(wp, regs);
-		if (uses_default_overflow_handler(wp))
+		if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
 			enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
 	}
 
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			info->trigger = addr;
 			pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
 			perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
-			if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp))
+			if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
 				enable_single_step(bp, addr);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 2f5755192c2b..722ac45f9f7b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static int breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned long esr,
 		perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
 
 		/* Do we need to handle the stepping? */
-		if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp))
+		if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
 			step = 1;
 unlock:
 		rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static u64 get_distance_from_watchpoint(unsigned long addr, u64 val,
 static int watchpoint_report(struct perf_event *wp, unsigned long addr,
 			     struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	int step = uses_default_overflow_handler(wp);
+	int step = is_default_overflow_handler(wp);
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(wp);
 
 	info->trigger = addr;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 65ad1294218f..13a2b05cc431 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1339,8 +1339,10 @@ extern int perf_event_output(struct perf_event *event,
 			     struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 static inline bool
-__is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler)
+is_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler = event->overflow_handler;
+
 	if (likely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_forward))
 		return true;
 	if (unlikely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_backward))
@@ -1348,19 +1350,6 @@ __is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler)
 	return false;
 }
 
-#define is_default_overflow_handler(event) \
-	__is_default_overflow_handler((event)->overflow_handler)
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
-static inline bool uses_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
-{
-	return is_default_overflow_handler(event);
-}
-#else
-#define uses_default_overflow_handler(event) \
-	is_default_overflow_handler(event)
-#endif
-
 extern void
 perf_event_header__init_id(struct perf_event_header *header,
 			   struct perf_sample_data *data,
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240412015019.7060-1-khuey@kylehuey.com>
2024-04-12  1:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] perf/bpf: Reorder bpf_overflow_handler() ahead of __perf_event_overflow() Kyle Huey
2024-04-12  1:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] perf/bpf: Create bpf_overflow_handler() stub for !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL Kyle Huey
2024-04-12  1:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] perf/bpf: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL from struct perf_event members Kyle Huey
2024-04-12  1:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] perf/bpf: Call bpf handler directly, not through overflow machinery Kyle Huey
2024-04-12  1:50 ` Kyle Huey [this message]
2024-04-12  1:50 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] perf/bpf: Allow a bpf program to suppress all sample side effects Kyle Huey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240412015019.7060-6-khuey@kylehuey.com \
    --to=me@kylehuey.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=khuey@kylehuey.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).