From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, nik.borisov@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:45:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240628174544.3118826-1-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
The x86 build process first generates required and disabled feature
masks based on current build config, and then uses these generated
masks to compile the source code. When a CPU feature is not enabled
in a build config, e.g., when CONFIG_X86_FRED=n, its feature disable
flag, i.e., DISABLE_FRED, needs to be properly defined and added to
a specific disabled CPU features mask in <asm/disabled-features.h>,
as the following patch does:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231205105030.8698-8-xin3.li@intel.com/.
As a result, the FRED feature bit is surely cleared in the generated
kernel binary when CONFIG_X86_FRED=n.
Recently there is another case to repeat the same exercise for the
AMD SEV-SNP CPU feature:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240126041126.1927228-2-michael.roth@amd.com/.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240126041126.1927228-23-michael.roth@amd.com/.
It was one thing when there were four of CPU feature masks, but with
over 20 it is going to cause mistakes, e.g.,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aaed79d5-d683-d1bc-7ba1-b33c8d6db618@suse.com/.
We want to eliminate the stupidly repeated exercise to manually assign
features to CPU feature words through introducing an AWK script to
automatically generate a header with required and disabled CPU feature
masks based on current build config, and this patch set does that.
Link to v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240622171435.3725548-1-xin@zytor.com/
Changes since v3:
* Add a few high-level comments to the AWK script (Nikolay Borisov).
* Use '1U' instead of '1' in feature mask shifting (Andrew Cooper).
* Checking NCAPINTS isn't necessary anymore. It was needed when these
macros had to be manually updated, but now if cpufeatures.h changes
this header will be regenerated (Brian Gerst).
* Enforce CPU feature mask values to be unsigned.
Changes since v2:
* Remove AWK code that generates extra debugging comments (Brian Gerst).
* Move SSE_MASK to verify_cpu.S, the only place it is used (Brian Gerst).
* Add a patch to generate macros {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET in the
new AWK script (Brian Gerst).
Changes since v1:
* Keep the X86_{REQUIRED,DISABLED}_FEATURE_ prefixes solely in
arch/x86/Kconfig.cpufeatures (Borislav Petkov).
* Explain how config option names X86_{REQUIRED,DISABLED}_FEATURE_<name>
are formed (Borislav Petkov).
* Remove code generating unused macros {REQUIRED,DISABLED}_FEATURE(x)
to tell if a CPU feature, e.g., X86_FEATURE_FRED, is a required or
disabled feature for this particular compile-time configuration.
H. Peter Anvin (Intel) (2):
x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs
x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config
Xin Li (Intel) (2):
x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h
x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET
arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu | 12 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig.cpufeatures | 197 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/Makefile | 17 +-
arch/x86/boot/cpucheck.c | 3 +-
arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c | 1 -
arch/x86/boot/mkcpustr.c | 3 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_32.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 4 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 70 +------
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 8 -
arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 161 --------------
arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h | 105 ----------
arch/x86/kernel/verify_cpu.S | 4 +
arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S | 2 +-
arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk | 92 ++++++++
lib/atomic64_test.c | 2 +-
tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 8 -
.../arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 161 --------------
.../arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h | 105 ----------
tools/perf/check-headers.sh | 2 -
25 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 645 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/Kconfig.cpufeatures
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
create mode 100755 arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
delete mode 100644 tools/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
delete mode 100644 tools/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
base-commit: f6a465a2d29701aa1a5189cae63a6870b65cef48
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-28 17:45 Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2024-06-28 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-28 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config Xin Li (Intel)
2024-07-01 10:44 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-07-03 9:23 ` Xin Li
2024-07-09 5:42 ` [PATCH v4A " Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-28 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h Xin Li (Intel)
2024-07-01 11:57 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-06-28 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET Xin Li (Intel)
2024-07-01 11:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-08-20 6:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li
2024-12-04 17:56 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240628174544.3118826-1-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).