Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Kan Liang  <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/7] perf: Don't disable preemption in perf_pending_task().
Date: Thu,  4 Jul 2024 19:03:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704170424.1466941-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240704170424.1466941-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

perf_pending_task() is invoked in task context and disables preemption
because perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() used to access per-CPU
variables. The other reason is to create a RCU read section while
accessing the perf_event.

The recursion counter is no longer a per-CPU accounter so disabling
preemption is no longer required. The RCU section is needed and must be
created explicit.

Replace the preemption-disable section with a explicit RCU-read section.

Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 1a26a9c33306a..67f5aab933c81 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5208,10 +5208,9 @@ static void perf_pending_task_sync(struct perf_event *event)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * All accesses related to the event are within the same
-	 * non-preemptible section in perf_pending_task(). The RCU
-	 * grace period before the event is freed will make sure all
-	 * those accesses are complete by then.
+	 * All accesses related to the event are within the same RCU section in
+	 * perf_pending_task(). The RCU grace period before the event is freed
+	 * will make sure all those accesses are complete by then.
 	 */
 	rcuwait_wait_event(&event->pending_work_wait, !event->pending_work, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 }
@@ -6842,7 +6841,7 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
 	 * critical section as the ->pending_work reset. See comment in
 	 * perf_pending_task_sync().
 	 */
-	preempt_disable_notrace();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	/*
 	 * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
 	 * and we won't recurse 'further'.
@@ -6855,10 +6854,10 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
 		local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
 		rcuwait_wake_up(&event->pending_work_wait);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	if (rctx >= 0)
 		perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
-	preempt_enable_notrace();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-04 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-04 17:03 [PATCH v5 0/6] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] perf: Move irq_work_queue() where the event is prepared Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] task_work: Add TWA_NMI_CURRENT as an additional notify mode Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-05 14:00   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-05 14:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] perf: Shrink the size of the recursion counter Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] perf: Move swevent_htable::recursion into task_struct Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-04 17:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-07-04 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] perf: Split __perf_pending_irq() out of perf_pending_irq() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-04 19:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-07-04 19:46   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-07-05  6:16   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-07-05  7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-05  7:58   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240704170424.1466941-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox