From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
To: acme@kernel.org
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, irogers@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/8] perf trace: Fix perf trace -p <PID>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:33:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240824163322.60796-2-howardchu95@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240824163322.60796-1-howardchu95@gmail.com>
'perf trace -p <PID>' work on a syscall that is unaugmented, but doesn't
work on a syscall that's augmented (when it calls perf_event_output() in
BPF).
Let's take open() as an example. open() is augmented in perf trace.
Before:
$ perf trace -e open -p 3792392
? ( ): ... [continued]: open()) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
? ( ): ... [continued]: open()) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
We can see there's no output.
After:
$ perf trace -e open -p 3792392
0.000 ( 0.123 ms): a.out/3792392 open(filename: "DINGZHEN", flags: WRONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
1000.398 ( 0.116 ms): a.out/3792392 open(filename: "DINGZHEN", flags: WRONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
Reason:
bpf_perf_event_output() will fail when you specify a pid in 'perf trace' (EOPNOTSUPP).
When using 'perf trace -p 114', before perf_event_open(), we'll have PID
= 114, and CPU = -1.
This is bad for bpf-output event, because the ring buffer won't accept
output from BPF's perf_event_output(), making it fail. I'm still trying
to find out why.
If we open bpf-output for every cpu, instead of setting it to -1, like
this:
PID = <PID>, CPU = 0
PID = <PID>, CPU = 1
PID = <PID>, CPU = 2
PID = <PID>, CPU = 3
Everything works.
You can test it with this script (open.c):
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
int main()
{
int i1 = 1, i2 = 2, i3 = 3, i4 = 4;
char s1[] = "DINGZHEN", s2[] = "XUEBAO";
while (1) {
syscall(SYS_open, s1, i1, i2);
sleep(1);
}
return 0;
}
save, compile:
make open
perf trace:
perf trace -e open <path-to-the-executable>
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815013626.935097-2-howardchu95@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index ef58a7764318..f14b7e6ff1dc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ int evlist__create_maps(struct evlist *evlist, struct target *target)
if (!threads)
return -1;
- if (target__uses_dummy_map(target))
+ if (target__uses_dummy_map(target) && !evlist__has_bpf_output(evlist))
cpus = perf_cpu_map__new_any_cpu();
else
cpus = perf_cpu_map__new(target->cpu_list);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-24 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-24 16:33 [PATCH v3 0/8] perf trace: Enhanced augmentation for pointer arguments Howard Chu
2024-08-24 16:33 ` Howard Chu [this message]
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] perf trace: Add trace__bpf_sys_enter_beauty_map() to prepare for fetching data in BPF Howard Chu
2024-09-09 19:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-09 20:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-10 4:59 ` Howard Chu
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] perf trace: Pass the richer 'struct syscall_arg' pointer to trace__btf_scnprintf() Howard Chu
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] perf trace: Pretty print struct data Howard Chu
2024-08-28 21:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-30 0:16 ` Howard Chu
2024-09-09 14:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-09 14:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] perf trace: Pretty print buffer data Howard Chu
2024-09-09 16:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-09 16:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-09 16:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-09 17:17 ` Howard Chu
2024-09-09 19:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-09 17:14 ` Howard Chu
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] perf trace: Collect augmented data using BPF Howard Chu
2024-09-04 19:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-04 21:11 ` Howard Chu
2024-09-11 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] perf trace: Add --force-btf for debugging Howard Chu
2024-08-24 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] perf trace: Add general tests for augmented syscalls Howard Chu
2024-09-09 22:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-10 5:00 ` Howard Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240824163322.60796-2-howardchu95@gmail.com \
--to=howardchu95@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).