From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] perf lock contention: Do not fail EEXIST for update
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 23:51:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830065150.1758962-3-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830065150.1758962-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
When it updates the lock stat for the first time, it needs to create an
element in the BPF hash map. But if there's a concurrent thread waiting
for the same lock (like for rwsem or rwlock), it might race with the
thread and possibly failed to update with -EEXIST. In that case, it can
lookup the map again and put the data there instead of failing.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
index 4b7237e178bd..52a876b42699 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
@@ -491,6 +491,12 @@ int contention_end(u64 *ctx)
err = bpf_map_update_elem(&lock_stat, &key, &first, BPF_NOEXIST);
if (err < 0) {
+ if (err == -EEXIST) {
+ /* it lost the race, try to get it again */
+ data = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&lock_stat, &key);
+ if (data != NULL)
+ goto found;
+ }
if (err == -E2BIG)
data_map_full = 1;
__sync_fetch_and_add(&data_fail, 1);
@@ -498,6 +504,7 @@ int contention_end(u64 *ctx)
goto out;
}
+found:
__sync_fetch_and_add(&data->total_time, duration);
__sync_fetch_and_add(&data->count, 1);
--
2.46.0.469.g59c65b2a67-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 6:51 [PATCH 1/3] perf lock contention: Handle error in a single place Namhyung Kim
2024-08-30 6:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf lock contention: Simplify spinlock check Namhyung Kim
2024-08-30 6:51 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-08-30 13:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf lock contention: Handle error in a single place Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240830065150.1758962-3-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).