From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com, irogers@google.com,
atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] perftool-testsuite 2nd batch
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 00:11:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240906001104.9314082caaf0268f09cc45b2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZtYIElLzMIzEVH9t@x1>
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:46:42 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 05:10:48PM +0200, Veronika Molnarova wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/2/24 16:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:31:36AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Veronika Molnarova wrote:
> > >>> On 8/30/24 17:27, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 05:39:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:10:55PM +0200, Veronika Molnarova wrote:
> > >>>> So, is there some other knob to get further output from that FAIL case?
> > >>>> Like the command that is failing? I'll try to take a look at the
> > >>>> sources, but are you seeing this problem with what is in
> > >>>> perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next?
> > >
> > >>> Couldn't reproduce the issue on multiple systems. There is no further way
> > >>> of getting more logs from the test case. The output of the failure is from
> > >>> the regex checking when a line wasn't matched to any possible regex.
> > >>> Looking at the test case "adding blacklisted function warn_thunk_thunk",
> > >>> the failure is caused by command 'perf probe warn_thunk_thunk', which is
> > >>> a blacklisted function taken from "/sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist".
> > >
> > > root@x1:~# grep thunk_thunk /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist
> > > 0xffffffff97004af0-0xffffffff97004b20 warn_thunk_thunk
> > > root@x1:~#
> > >
right, thunk functions should not be probed.
> > > <SNIP>
> > >
> > >> /tmp/perftool-testsuite_probe.RJh/perf_probe/logs/adding_blacklisted.err:A function DIE doesn't have decl_line. Maybe broken DWARF?
> > >> root@x1:~# cat /tmp/perftool-testsuite_probe.RJh/perf_probe/logs/adding_blacklisted.err
> > >> A function DIE doesn't have decl_line. Maybe broken DWARF?
> > >> A function DIE doesn't have decl_line. Maybe broken DWARF?
> > >> Probe point 'warn_thunk_thunk' not found.
Yeah, thunk functions are defined by asm code. No DWARF is available.
> > >> Error: Failed to add events.
> > >> root@x1:~#
> > >> root@x1:~# cat /tmp/perftool-testsuite_probe.RJh/perf_probe/logs/adding_blacklisted_list.log
> > >> root@x1:~# cat /tmp/perftool-testsuite_probe.RJh/perf_probe/logs/adding_blacklisted.log
> > >> root@x1:~#
> > >>
> > >> So is it just a matter of adding this output to the expected outputs?
> > >> In test_adding_blacklisted.sh?
> > >
> > > Did the patch below, now it passes, Ack?
> > >
> > > root@x1:~# export PERFTEST_KEEP_LOGS=y
> > > root@x1:~# perf test 88
> > > 88: perftool-testsuite_probe : Ok
> > > root@x1:~#
> > >
> > > Or am I missing the point? :-)
> > >
> > > - Arnaldo
> >
> > Yeah, that would fix the test case, the question is whether we should
>
> I was lazy, but yeah, that thought crossed my mind, good thing you did
> the due diligence and found that patch! Looking at it now.
>
> > accept it as a possible output. Found some old patch that should have
> > fixed the mentioned issue:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230628082337.1857302-3-georgmueller@gmx.net/
>
> I updated Masami's e-mail to a more recent one, Masami-san, wdyt? Can I
> have your opinion on the patch pointed out by Veronika?
Thanks for update my email. Yeah, it looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks,
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/test_adding_blacklisted.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/test_adding_blacklisted.sh
> > > index b5dc10b2a73810b3..14290d08a4a96eaf 100755
> > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/test_adding_blacklisted.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/test_adding_blacklisted.sh
> > > @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ REGEX_ERROR_MESSAGE="Error: Failed to add events."
> > > REGEX_INVALID_ARGUMENT="Failed to write event: Invalid argument"
> > > REGEX_SYMBOL_FAIL="Failed to find symbol at $RE_ADDRESS"
> > > REGEX_OUT_SECTION="$BLACKFUNC is out of \.\w+, skip it"
> > > -../common/check_all_lines_matched.pl "$REGEX_SKIP_MESSAGE" "$REGEX_NOT_FOUND_MESSAGE" "$REGEX_ERROR_MESSAGE" "$REGEX_SCOPE_FAIL" "$REGEX_INVALID_ARGUMENT" "$REGEX_SYMBOL_FAIL" "$REGEX_OUT_SECTION" < $LOGS_DIR/adding_blacklisted.err
> > > +REGEX_MISSING_DECL_LINE="A function DIE doesn't have decl_line. Maybe broken DWARF?"
> > > +../common/check_all_lines_matched.pl "$REGEX_SKIP_MESSAGE" "$REGEX_NOT_FOUND_MESSAGE" "$REGEX_ERROR_MESSAGE" "$REGEX_SCOPE_FAIL" "$REGEX_INVALID_ARGUMENT" "$REGEX_SYMBOL_FAIL" "$REGEX_OUT_SECTION" "$REGEX_MISSING_DECL_LINE" < $LOGS_DIR/adding_blacklisted.err
> > > CHECK_EXIT_CODE=$?
> > >
> > > print_results $PERF_EXIT_CODE $CHECK_EXIT_CODE "adding blacklisted function $BLACKFUNC"
> > >
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 13:07 [PATCH 00/11] perftool-testsuite 2nd batch Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:07 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf tests shell: Skip base_* dirs in test script search Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf testsuite: Merge settings files for shell tests Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf testsuite: Fix shellcheck warnings Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for blacklisted kprobes handling Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for basic perf-probe options Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for invalid options Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for line semantics Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf testsuite: Add common output checking helper Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf testsuite report: Add test for perf-report basic functionality Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf testsuite report: Add test case for perf report Michael Petlan
2024-06-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf testsuite: Install perf-report tests Michael Petlan
2024-06-27 22:29 ` [PATCH 00/11] perftool-testsuite 2nd batch Namhyung Kim
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 " vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] perf tests shell: Skip base_* dirs in test script search vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] perf testsuite: Merge settings files for shell tests vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] perf testsuite: Fix shellcheck warnings vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for blacklisted kprobes handling vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for basic perf-probe options vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for invalid options vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] perf testsuite probe: Add test for line semantics vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] perf testsuite: Add common output checking helper vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] perf testsuite report: Add test for perf-report basic functionality vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] perf testsuite report: Add test case for perf report vmolnaro
2024-07-02 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] perf testsuite: Install perf-report tests vmolnaro
2024-08-28 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] perftool-testsuite 2nd batch Veronika Molnarova
2024-08-28 20:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] perf tests shell: Skip base_* dirs in test script search vmolnaro
2024-08-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] perf testsuite: Install perf-report tests vmolnaro
2024-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] perftool-testsuite 2nd batch Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-02 14:05 ` Veronika Molnarova
2024-09-02 14:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-02 14:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-02 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-02 15:10 ` Veronika Molnarova
2024-09-02 18:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-02 21:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-05 15:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2024-09-05 19:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-05 19:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-12 13:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-19 13:14 ` Veronika Molnarova
2024-09-26 22:33 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240906001104.9314082caaf0268f09cc45b2@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).