From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v5 2/6] perf x86/topdown: Correct leader selection with sample_read enabled
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:47:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240913084712.13861-3-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913084712.13861-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Addresses an issue where, in the absence of a topdown metrics event
within a sampling group, the slots event was incorrectly bypassed as
the sampling leader when sample_read was enabled.
perf record -e '{slots,branches}:S' -c 10000 -vv sleep 1
In this case, the slots event should be sampled as leader but the
branches event is sampled in fact like the verbose output shows.
perf_event_attr:
type 4 (cpu)
size 168
config 0x400 (slots)
sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|IDENTIFIER
read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
disabled 1
sample_id_all 1
exclude_guest 1
------------------------------------------------------------
sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
------------------------------------------------------------
perf_event_attr:
type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
size 168
config 0x4 (PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS)
{ sample_period, sample_freq } 10000
sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|IDENTIFIER
read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
sample_id_all 1
exclude_guest 1
The sample period of slots event instead of branches event is reset to
0.
This fix ensures the slots event remains the leader under these
conditions.
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
index 49f25d67ed77..cb2c64928bc4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include "api/fs/fs.h"
#include "util/evsel.h"
+#include "util/evlist.h"
#include "util/pmu.h"
#include "util/pmus.h"
#include "util/topdown.h"
@@ -87,11 +88,24 @@ bool arch_is_topdown_metrics(const struct evsel *evsel)
*/
bool arch_topdown_sample_read(struct evsel *leader)
{
+ struct evsel *evsel;
+
if (!evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(leader))
return false;
- if (arch_is_topdown_slots(leader))
- return true;
+ if (!arch_is_topdown_slots(leader))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * If slots event as leader event but no topdown metric events
+ * in group, slots event should still sample as leader.
+ */
+ evlist__for_each_entry(leader->evlist, evsel) {
+ if (evsel->core.leader != leader->core.leader)
+ return false;
+ if (evsel != leader && arch_is_topdown_metrics(evsel))
+ return true;
+ }
return false;
}
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 8:47 [Patch v5 0/6] Bug fixes on topdown events reordering Dapeng Mi
2024-09-13 8:47 ` [Patch v5 1/6] perf x86/topdown: Complete topdown slots/metrics events check Dapeng Mi
2024-10-08 5:55 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-09 9:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-09-13 8:47 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2024-09-13 8:47 ` [Patch v5 3/6] perf x86/topdown: Don't move topdown metric events in group Dapeng Mi
2024-09-13 8:47 ` [Patch v5 4/6] perf tests: Add leader sampling test in record tests Dapeng Mi
2024-09-13 8:47 ` [Patch v5 5/6] perf tests: Add topdown events counting and sampling tests Dapeng Mi
2024-09-13 8:47 ` [Patch v5 6/6] perf tests: Add more topdown events regroup tests Dapeng Mi
2024-10-01 21:02 ` [Patch v5 0/6] Bug fixes on topdown events reordering Namhyung Kim
2024-10-01 22:32 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-02 14:31 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-03 0:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-03 0:57 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-03 14:57 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-03 15:55 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-03 16:45 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-03 19:45 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-03 21:26 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-03 22:13 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-03 23:29 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-03 23:36 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-04 5:19 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-08 2:52 ` Mi, Dapeng1
2024-10-08 5:13 ` Ian Rogers
2024-10-08 2:31 ` Mi, Dapeng1
2024-10-08 2:30 ` Mi, Dapeng1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240913084712.13861-3-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).