From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 7/9] perf tools: Check fallback error and order
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 23:23:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241016062359.264929-8-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241016062359.264929-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
The perf_event_open might fail due to various reasons, so blindly
reducing precise_ip level might not be the best way to deal with it.
It seems the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU doesn't support the
given precise level. Let's try again with the correct error code.
This caused a problem on AMD, as it stops on precise_ip of 2 for IBS but
user events with exclude_kernel=1 cannot make progress. Let's add the
evsel__handle_error_quirks() to this case specially. I plan to work on
the kernel side to improve this situation but it'd still need some
special handling for IBS.
Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index a7213cfa75f31150..68380d08a21c5a36 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2060,9 +2060,9 @@ static void evsel__detect_missing_brstack_features(struct evsel *evsel)
/*
* Must probe features in the order they were added to the
- * perf_event_attr interface. These are PMU specific limitation
- * so we can detect with the given hardware event and stop on the
- * first one succeeded.
+ * perf_event_attr interface. These are kernel core limitation but
+ * specific to PMUs with branch stack. So we can detect with the given
+ * hardware event and stop on the first one succeeded.
*/
/* Please add new feature detection here. */
@@ -2288,6 +2288,25 @@ static bool evsel__detect_missing_features(struct evsel *evsel)
return false;
}
+static bool evsel__handle_error_quirks(struct evsel *evsel, int error)
+{
+ /*
+ * AMD core PMU tries to forward events with precise_ip to IBS PMU
+ * implicitly. But IBS PMU has more restrictions so it can fail with
+ * supported event attributes. Let's forward it back to the core PMU
+ * by clearing precise_ip only if it's from precise_max (:P).
+ */
+ if ((error == -EINVAL || error == -ENOENT) && x86__is_amd_cpu() &&
+ evsel->core.attr.precise_ip && evsel->precise_max) {
+ evsel->core.attr.precise_ip = 0;
+ pr_debug2_peo("removing precise_ip on AMD\n");
+ display_attr(&evsel->core.attr);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
struct perf_thread_map *threads,
int start_cpu_map_idx, int end_cpu_map_idx)
@@ -2408,9 +2427,6 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
return 0;
try_fallback:
- if (evsel__precise_ip_fallback(evsel))
- goto retry_open;
-
if (evsel__ignore_missing_thread(evsel, perf_cpu_map__nr(cpus),
idx, threads, thread, err)) {
/* We just removed 1 thread, so lower the upper nthreads limit. */
@@ -2427,11 +2443,15 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
if (err == -EMFILE && rlimit__increase_nofile(&set_rlimit))
goto retry_open;
- if (err != -EINVAL || idx > 0 || thread > 0)
- goto out_close;
+ if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP && evsel__precise_ip_fallback(evsel))
+ goto retry_open;
- if (evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel))
+ if (err == -EINVAL && evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel))
goto fallback_missing_features;
+
+ if (evsel__handle_error_quirks(evsel, err))
+ goto retry_open;
+
out_close:
if (err)
threads->err_thread = thread;
--
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 6:23 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v5) Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] perf tools: Add fallback for exclude_guest Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] perf tools: Don't set attr.exclude_guest by default Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] perf tools: Simplify evsel__add_modifier() Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] perf tools: Do not set exclude_guest for precise_ip Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] perf tools: Detect missing kernel features properly Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] perf tools: Move x86__is_amd_cpu() to util/env.c Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] perf record: Just use "cycles:P" as the default event Namhyung Kim
2024-10-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] perf test: Add precise_max subtest to the perf record shell test Namhyung Kim
2024-10-23 18:01 ` [PATCHSET 0/9] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v5) Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241016062359.264929-8-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).