* [PATCH v2] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390
@ 2024-10-18 8:17 Thomas Richter
2024-10-21 16:01 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Richter @ 2024-10-18 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, namhyung
Cc: agordeev, gor, sumanthk, hca, Thomas Richter
Perf test case 84 'perf pipe recording and injection test'
sometime fails on s390, especially on z/VM virtual machines.
This is caused by a very short run time of workload
# perf test -w noploop
which runs for 1 second. Occasionally this is not long
enough and the perf report has no samples for symbol noploop.
Fix this and enlarge the runtime for the perf work load
to 3 seconds. This ensures the symbol noploop is always
present. Since only s390 is affected, make this loop
architecture dependend.
Output before:
Inject -b build-ids test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.277 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.160 MB
/tmp/perf.data.ELzRdq (4031 samples) ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
Inject -b build-ids test [Success]
Inject --buildid-all build-ids test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.195 MB - ]
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.014 MB - ]
Inject --buildid-all build-ids test [Failed - cannot find
noploop function in pipe #2]
Output after:
Successful execution for over 10 times in a loop.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
index d4c8005ce9b9..e459aa99a951 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/pipe_test.sh
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ skip_test_missing_symbol ${sym}
data=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data.XXXXXX)
data2=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.data2.XXXXXX)
prog="perf test -w noploop"
+[ "$(uname -m)" = "s390x" ] && prog="$prog 3"
err=0
set -e
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390
2024-10-18 8:17 [PATCH v2] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390 Thomas Richter
@ 2024-10-21 16:01 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-10-21 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, Thomas Richter
Cc: agordeev, gor, sumanthk, hca
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:17:32 +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Perf test case 84 'perf pipe recording and injection test'
> sometime fails on s390, especially on z/VM virtual machines.
>
> This is caused by a very short run time of workload
>
> # perf test -w noploop
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-21 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-18 8:17 [PATCH v2] perf test: Fix perf test case 84 on s390 Thomas Richter
2024-10-21 16:01 ` Namhyung Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).