From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf: test: Speed up running brstack test
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:13:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241213231312.2640687-2-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
The brstack test runs quite slowly in software models. Part of the reason
is "xargs -n1" is quite inefficient in replacing spaces with newlines.
While that's not noticeable on normal machines, it is on software models.
Use "tr -s ' ' '\n'" instead which can do the same transformation, but is
much faster. For comparison on an M1 Macbook Pro:
$ time seq -s ' ' 10000 | xargs -n1 > /dev/null
real 0m2.729s
user 0m2.009s
sys 0m0.914s
$ time seq -s ' ' 10000 | tr -s ' ' '\n' | grep '.' > /dev/null
real 0m0.002s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.001s
The "grep '.'" is also needed to remove any remaining blank lines.
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
[robh: Drop changing loop iterations on arm64. Squash blank line fix and redo commit msg]
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
Originally part of this series[1], but I've dropped any Arm specifics,
and it stands on its own. No reason this needs to wait on Arm BRBE
support (which I'm working on now). I don't expect to have other changes
to this test related to BRBE anymore.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240613061731.3109448-8-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
index 5f14d0cb013f..e01df7581393 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ test_user_branches() {
echo "Testing user branch stack sampling"
perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- ${TESTPROG} > /dev/null 2>&1
- perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script
+ perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | tr -s ' ' '\n' > $TMPDIR/perf.script
# example of branch entries:
# brstack_foo+0x14/brstack_bar+0x40/P/-/-/0/CALL
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ test_filter() {
echo "Testing branch stack filtering permutation ($test_filter_filter,$test_filter_expect)"
perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter $test_filter_filter,save_type,u -- ${TESTPROG} > /dev/null 2>&1
- perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstack | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script
+ perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstack | tr -s ' ' '\n' | grep '.' > $TMPDIR/perf.script
# fail if we find any branch type that doesn't match any of the expected ones
# also consider UNKNOWN branch types (-)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 23:13 Rob Herring (Arm) [this message]
2024-12-17 14:41 ` [PATCH] perf: test: Speed up running brstack test James Clark
2024-12-18 3:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-12-19 5:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-01-13 14:25 ` Rob Herring
2025-01-13 14:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241213231312.2640687-2-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).