From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Fix compile error on sample->user_regs
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:16:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214191641.756664-1-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
It's recently changed to allocate dynamically but misses to update some
arch-dependent codes to use perf_sample__user_regs().
Fixes: dc6d2bc2d893a878 ("perf sample: Make user_regs and intr_regs optional")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
v2) fix arm (32-bit) as well
tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/dwarf-unwind.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind-libdw.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/csky/util/unwind-libdw.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/unwind-libdw.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/tests/dwarf-unwind.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/unwind-libdw.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/unwind-libdw.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/arch/s390/util/unwind-libdw.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/dwarf-unwind.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
index 9bc304cb7762b5d1..f421910e07097152 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int sample_ustack(struct perf_sample *sample,
int test__arch_unwind_sample(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct thread *thread)
{
- struct regs_dump *regs = &sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *regs = perf_sample__user_regs(sample);
u64 *buf;
buf = calloc(1, sizeof(u64) * PERF_REGS_MAX);
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind-libdw.c
index 4e02cef461e3af34..fbb643f224ec4b27 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
- struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *user_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(ui->sample);
Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[PERF_REG_ARM_MAX];
#define REG(r) ({ \
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/unwind-libdw.c
index 79df4374ab18dc36..b20b1569783d7e98 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
- struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *user_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(ui->sample);
Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[PERF_REG_CSKY_MAX];
#define REG(r) ({ \
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/unwind-libdw.c
index 7b3b9a4b21f8f482..60b1144bedd5f325 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
- struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *user_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(ui->sample);
Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[PERF_REG_LOONGARCH_MAX];
#define REG(r) ({ \
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/tests/dwarf-unwind.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
index 5ecf82893b84d5c0..66af884baa660389 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int sample_ustack(struct perf_sample *sample,
int test__arch_unwind_sample(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct thread *thread)
{
- struct regs_dump *regs = &sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *regs = perf_sample__user_regs(sample);
u64 *buf;
buf = calloc(1, sizeof(u64) * PERF_REGS_MAX);
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/unwind-libdw.c
index e9a5a8bb67d9186e..82d0c28ae3459ecd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static const int special_regs[3][2] = {
bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
- struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *user_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(ui->sample);
Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[32], dwarf_nip;
size_t i;
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/unwind-libdw.c
index 5c98010d8b59777f..dc1476e16321736d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
- struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *user_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(ui->sample);
Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[32];
#define REG(r) ({ \
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/unwind-libdw.c
index f50fb6dbb35c5dc6..c27c7a0d1076c890 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
{
struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
- struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
+ struct regs_dump *user_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(ui->sample);
Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[ARRAY_SIZE(s390_dwarf_regs)];
#define REG(r) ({ \
--
2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 19:16 Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-02-14 19:50 ` [PATCH v2] perf tools: Fix compile error on sample->user_regs Ian Rogers
2025-02-14 21:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-14 21:23 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250214191641.756664-1-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox