From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B5525C713; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741281645; cv=none; b=dwWcIeFPD7pOvQ3fWX9BTZod9BBttQnxzKC/sakhyKcXe9Yut1+b8hImTPy3N8/FVCw5VRIJc8a4resDlvXqu81bQ0ZGk200JPGIDSRl9JSB6RB5A9pku2eUIKNhBS3Va7FdMofIeWNnhgleQ79AvOJ+yoB8IL+t5+NK9KJjjig= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741281645; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9GUHUm17IEQGFD6aYmbJ0438ocdu4QCOxvX9Y6riGNw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Y0uRIEW75vhUEVyk1h2MPT9hZkJenffEnRi+I82Jy2siYfisGHPMHFYq5eWz6y+YfdYEe6j505elSssL8t61lN4bKgruzmCQjTCWk0kuZh5wxHCPO/4YHE5ZecWbYaPQUBtzjnYMUn5xotIXeFJV7A57k7Cq5MP44MHhQTivVZ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jawEpkgl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jawEpkgl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741281643; x=1772817643; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9GUHUm17IEQGFD6aYmbJ0438ocdu4QCOxvX9Y6riGNw=; b=jawEpkgl/u2AVTWr/G/Ey8ashubYmJbL7BeZc9JI/D1Qy2+Q45+r6J5n vxQ8coyA2SZXyKDDVaAznjho6vnctlrzl+8xCq/G2LeeF7jhQYVvwZeFa FzAcOmaMwq3sID1Va1KDaXj0GL5d1r1XH1+cOVpSwK7GRVEdjWfVxbKV9 yLVxEkuutC7Yn/3wiZDgQzIc/EcGO+Ot2SWiYXGKGSYxm781MRQ45Q9zi 8IGv9ddAKXrzP6TSqBNnI9fTpOzWugUk8v6W+Q4+xt/xXcF9GZG/aFw+M S9ouzsYdj9gv9QV+3iPUIsUM4jOtN4ZT1EY+8socSvuXqwwu55YFB/Anm Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AIbOlETDRNu6Kr+OY4sABQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: A55RFoOfTRuXJHN4LTYNDw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11365"; a="45113709" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,226,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="45113709" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2025 09:20:41 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: q6yKqGi/RTO2LwlRfA2WsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fQND1tF+R4268TMVX/TiMw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,226,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="119589068" Received: from sho10-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO desk) ([10.125.145.178]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2025 09:20:41 -0800 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:20:34 -0800 From: Pawan Gupta To: Dave Hansen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf , Srinivas Pandruvada , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ricardo Neri , "Liang, Kan" , Andrew Cooper , Brice Goglin , Mario Limonciello , Perry Yuan , Dapeng Mi Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/bugs: Declutter vulnerable CPU list Message-ID: <20250306172034.qf767eqcrw5m22ln@desk> References: <20250305-add-cpu-type-v6-0-4741735bcd75@linux.intel.com> <20250305-add-cpu-type-v6-4-4741735bcd75@linux.intel.com> <542cfd1b-65f8-4fa9-811e-d70850d0cf9a@intel.com> <20250306165757.sh6azitvazhq5lxj@desk> <39d1597a-d165-4f79-a2fc-d37fc2822909@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <39d1597a-d165-4f79-a2fc-d37fc2822909@intel.com> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:03:52AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 3/6/25 08:57, Pawan Gupta wrote: > > As one of the goal of the patch is to shorten the macro names and follow > > the VULNWL_<> pattern, would it make sense to rename VULNWL_INTEL to: > > > > #define VULNWL_VFM(vfm, whitelist) \ > > X86_MATCH_VFM(vfm, whitelist) > > I don't think saving 6 characters justifies the extra level of > abstraction personally. Ok, I will stick with X86_MATCH_VFM().