public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jianzhou Zhao <luckd0g@163.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in perf_ctx_lock  in  linux6.12.25(longterm maintenance)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:49:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250429154946.GA4439@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77c2ee24.b63e.19681e979ea.Coremail.luckd0g@163.com>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:18:04PM +0800, Jianzhou Zhao wrote:
> Hello, I found a potential bug titled "   possible deadlock in perf_ctx_lock " with modified syzkaller in the Linux6.12.25(longterm maintenance, last updated on April 25, 2025)

Nah, you hit a WARN and then printk being lousy made it explode worse.

> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 15835 at kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:375 perf_trace_add+0x2da/0x390 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:375
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15835 Comm: syz.9.499 Not tainted 6.12.25 #3
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:perf_trace_add+0x2da/0x390 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:375
> Code: fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 75 64 48 89 ab f8 01 00 00 48 89 df e8 b1 ab 26 00 e9 f3 fd ff ff e8 37 87 f6 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 41 bc ea ff ff ff e9 77 ff ff ff e8 23 c5 56 00 e9 8a fd
> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000713f7f0 EFLAGS: 00010006
> RAX: 0000000040000002 RBX: ffff88802a069880 RCX: ffffffff8195a68e
> RDX: ffff888045ec2500 RSI: ffffffff8195a839 RDI: ffffffff8deabf48
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52000e27eef
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: ffffffff8deabee0 R14: ffff88802a069928 R15: ffff888051237200
> FS:  00007fe4fec1c640(0000) GS:ffff88802b800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f50219e7bac CR3: 00000000743bc000 CR4: 0000000000752ef0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> PKRU: 80000000
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  event_sched_in+0x434/0xac0 kernel/events/core.c:2629
>  group_sched_in kernel/events/core.c:2662 [inline]
>  merge_sched_in+0x895/0x1570 kernel/events/core.c:3940
>  visit_groups_merge.constprop.0.isra.0+0x6d2/0x1250 kernel/events/core.c:3885
>  pmu_groups_sched_in kernel/events/core.c:3967 [inline]
>  __pmu_ctx_sched_in kernel/events/core.c:3979 [inline]
>  ctx_sched_in+0x5c1/0xa30 kernel/events/core.c:4030
>  perf_event_sched_in+0x5d/0x90 kernel/events/core.c:2760
>  perf_event_context_sched_in kernel/events/core.c:4077 [inline]
>  __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x33a/0x6f0 kernel/events/core.c:4106
>  perf_event_task_sched_in include/linux/perf_event.h:1524 [inline]
>  finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x5f9/0xcb0 kernel/sched/core.c:5201
>  context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5335 [inline]
>  __schedule+0x1156/0x5b20 kernel/sched/core.c:6710
>  preempt_schedule_irq+0x51/0x90 kernel/sched/core.c:7032
>  irqentry_exit+0x36/0x90 kernel/entry/common.c:354
>  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702

Not quite sure which of the WARNs that is, as I don't keep the stable
trees around and .12 is quite old by now.

Anyway, if you can reproduce I'll take a look.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 14:18 possible deadlock in perf_ctx_lock in linux6.12.25(longterm maintenance) Jianzhou Zhao
2025-04-29 14:54 ` Jianzhou Zhao
2025-04-29 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250429154946.GA4439@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luckd0g@163.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox