linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@meta.com>,
	Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Weinan Liu <wnliu@google.com>,
	Blake Jones <blakejones@google.com>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
	Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:32:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250501013506.248033485@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250501013202.997535180@goodmis.org

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

Make unwind_deferred_request() NMI-safe so tracers in NMI context can
call it to get the cookie immediately rather than have to do the fragile
"schedule irq work and then call unwind_deferred_request()" dance.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
Changes since v5: https://lore.kernel.org/20250424192612.669992559@goodmis.org

- Have unwind_deferred_request() return positive if already queued.

 include/linux/unwind_deferred_types.h |   1 +
 kernel/unwind/deferred.c              | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/unwind_deferred_types.h b/include/linux/unwind_deferred_types.h
index 33373c32c221..8f47d77ddda0 100644
--- a/include/linux/unwind_deferred_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/unwind_deferred_types.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct unwind_cache {
 struct unwind_task_info {
 	struct unwind_cache	cache;
 	u64			cookie;
+	u64			nmi_cookie;
 	struct callback_head	work;
 	int			pending;
 };
diff --git a/kernel/unwind/deferred.c b/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
index b93ad97daf94..d86ea82a8915 100644
--- a/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
+++ b/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
@@ -47,23 +47,47 @@ static u64 ctx_to_cookie(u64 cpu, u64 ctx)
 
 /*
  * Read the task context cookie, first initializing it if this is the first
- * call to get_cookie() since the most recent entry from user.
+ * call to get_cookie() since the most recent entry from user.  This has to be
+ * done carefully to coordinate with unwind_deferred_request_nmi().
  */
 static u64 get_cookie(struct unwind_task_info *info)
 {
 	u64 ctx_ctr;
 	u64 cookie;
-	u64 cpu;
 
 	guard(irqsave)();
 
-	cookie = info->cookie;
+	cookie = READ_ONCE(info->cookie);
 	if (cookie)
 		return cookie;
 
-	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	ctx_ctr = __this_cpu_inc_return(unwind_ctx_ctr);
-	info->cookie = ctx_to_cookie(cpu, ctx_ctr);
+	ctx_ctr = __this_cpu_read(unwind_ctx_ctr);
+
+	/* Read ctx_ctr before info->nmi_cookie */
+	barrier();
+
+	cookie = READ_ONCE(info->nmi_cookie);
+	if (cookie) {
+		/*
+		 * This is the first call to get_cookie() since an NMI handler
+		 * first wrote it to info->nmi_cookie.  Sync it.
+		 */
+		WRITE_ONCE(info->cookie, cookie);
+		WRITE_ONCE(info->nmi_cookie, 0);
+		return cookie;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Write info->cookie.  It's ok to race with an NMI here.  The value of
+	 * the cookie is based on ctx_ctr from before the NMI could have
+	 * incremented it.  The result will be the same even if cookie or
+	 * ctx_ctr end up getting written twice.
+	 */
+	cookie = ctx_to_cookie(raw_smp_processor_id(), ctx_ctr + 1);
+	WRITE_ONCE(info->cookie, cookie);
+	WRITE_ONCE(info->nmi_cookie, 0);
+	barrier();
+	__this_cpu_write(unwind_ctx_ctr, ctx_ctr + 1);
 
 	return info->cookie;
 }
@@ -139,6 +163,51 @@ static void unwind_deferred_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
 		WRITE_ONCE(info->cookie, 0);
 }
 
+static int unwind_deferred_request_nmi(struct unwind_work *work, u64 *cookie)
+{
+	struct unwind_task_info *info = &current->unwind_info;
+	bool inited_cookie = false;
+	int ret;
+
+	*cookie = info->cookie;
+	if (!*cookie) {
+		/*
+		 * This is the first unwind request since the most recent entry
+		 * from user.  Initialize the task cookie.
+		 *
+		 * Don't write to info->cookie directly, otherwise it may get
+		 * cleared if the NMI occurred in the kernel during early entry
+		 * or late exit before the task work gets to run.  Instead, use
+		 * info->nmi_cookie which gets synced later by get_cookie().
+		 */
+		if (!info->nmi_cookie) {
+			u64 cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+			u64 ctx_ctr;
+
+			ctx_ctr = __this_cpu_inc_return(unwind_ctx_ctr);
+			info->nmi_cookie = ctx_to_cookie(cpu, ctx_ctr);
+
+			inited_cookie = true;
+		}
+
+		*cookie = info->nmi_cookie;
+	}
+
+	if (info->pending)
+		return 1;
+
+	ret = task_work_add(current, &info->work, TWA_NMI_CURRENT);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (inited_cookie)
+			info->nmi_cookie = 0;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	info->pending = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Schedule a user space unwind to be done in task work before exiting the
  * kernel.
@@ -160,31 +229,38 @@ static void unwind_deferred_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
 int unwind_deferred_request(struct unwind_work *work, u64 *cookie)
 {
 	struct unwind_task_info *info = &current->unwind_info;
+	int pending;
 	int ret;
 
 	*cookie = 0;
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if ((current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_EXITING)) ||
 	    !user_mode(task_pt_regs(current)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (in_nmi())
+		return unwind_deferred_request_nmi(work, cookie);
+
 	guard(irqsave)();
 
 	*cookie = get_cookie(info);
 
 	/* callback already pending? */
-	if (info->pending)
+	pending = READ_ONCE(info->pending);
+	if (pending)
+		return 1;
+
+	/* Claim the work unless an NMI just now swooped in to do so. */
+	if (!try_cmpxchg(&info->pending, &pending, 1))
 		return 1;
 
 	/* The work has been claimed, now schedule it. */
 	ret = task_work_add(current, &info->work, TWA_RESUME);
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret)) {
+		WRITE_ONCE(info->pending, 0);
 		return ret;
+	}
 
-	info->pending = 1;
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.47.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-01  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-01  1:32 [PATCH v6 0/5] perf: Deferred unwinding of user space stack traces for per CPU events Steven Rostedt
2025-05-01  1:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] unwind_user/deferred: Add deferred unwinding interface Steven Rostedt
2025-05-01  1:32 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-05-01  1:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] unwind deferred: Use bitmask to determine which callbacks to call Steven Rostedt
2025-05-01  1:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] unwind deferred: Use SRCU unwind_deferred_task_work() Steven Rostedt
2025-05-01  1:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] perf: Support deferred user callchains for per CPU events Steven Rostedt
2025-05-01 20:14   ` Namhyung Kim
2025-05-01 20:57     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 20:16       ` Namhyung Kim
2025-05-01 20:20   ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250501013506.248033485@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=blakejones@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jordalgo@meta.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=wnliu@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).