From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
krzk@kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mike.leach@linaro.org,
james.clark@linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, gshan@redhat.com,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com, saravanak@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] of: of_cpu_phandle_to_id to support SMT threads
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 09:18:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250606141857.GA1476878-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512080715.82-8-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 09:07:15AM +0100, Alireza Sanaee wrote:
> Enhance the API to support SMT threads, this will allow sharing
> resources among multiple SMT threads.
>
> Enabled the sharing of resources, such as L1 Cache and clocks, between
> SMT threads. It introduces a fix that uses thread IDs to match each CPU
> thread in the register array within the cpu-node. This ensures that the
> cpu-map or any driver relying on this API is fine even when SMT threads
> share resources.
>
> Additionally, I have tested this for CPU based on the discussions in
> [1], I adopted the new cpu-map layout, where the first parameter is a
> phandle and the second is the local thread index, as shown below:
>
> core0 {
> thread0 {
> cpu = <&cpu0 0>;
> };
> thread1 {
> cpu = <&cpu0 1>;
> };
I think the thread nodes should be omitted in this case.
> };
>
> Also, there are devices such as below that are a bit different.
>
> arm_dsu@0 {
> compatible = "arm,dsu";
> cpus = <&cpu0 &cpu1 &cpu2 &cpu3>;
> }
>
> In these cases, we can also point to a CPU thread as well like the
> following:
>
> arm_dsu@0 {
> compatible = "arm,dsu";
> cpus = <&cpu0 5 &cpu1 9 &cpu2 1 &cpu3 0>;
The purpose of 'cpus' properties is to define CPU affinity. I don't
think the affinity could ever be different for threads in a core.
And cpu1 having 10 threads is nonsense.
Most cases of 'cpus' (and 'affinity') lookups and then callers of
of_cpu_node_to_id() ultimately just want to set a cpumask. So we should
provide that rather than opencoding the same loop everywhere.
> }
>
> It should be possible to know how many arguments a phandle might
> require, and this information is encoded in another variable in the dt
> called #cpu-cells in cpu node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/devicetree-spec/CAL_JsqK1yqRLD9B+G7UUp=D8K++mXHq0Rmv=1i6DL_jXyZwXAw@mail.gmail.com/
> ---
> drivers/of/cpu.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/cpu.c b/drivers/of/cpu.c
> index fba17994fc20..cf54ef47f029 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/cpu.c
> @@ -189,16 +189,41 @@ int of_cpu_phandle_to_id(const struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node **cpu_np,
> uint8_t cpu_idx)
> {
> + bool found = false;
> + int cpu, ret = -1, i, j;
> + uint32_t local_thread, thread_index;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
> + static const char * const phandle_names[] = { "cpus", "cpu" };
> + static const char * const cpu_cells[] = { "#cpu-cells", NULL };
> +
> if (!node)
> - return -1;
> + return ret;
>
> - *cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
> - if (!*cpu_np)
> - *cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpus", cpu_idx);
> - if (!*cpu_np)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phandle_names); i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_cells); j++) {
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, phandle_names[i],
> + cpu_cells[j], cpu_idx,
> + &args);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + goto success;
> + }
> + }
>
> - return of_cpu_node_to_id(*cpu_np);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +success:
> + *cpu_np = args.np;
> + thread_index = args.args_count == 1 ? args.args[0] : 0;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, &local_thread);
> + found = (*cpu_np == np) && (local_thread == thread_index);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (found)
> + return cpu;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpu_phandle_to_id);
>
> @@ -206,7 +231,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpu_phandle_to_id);
> * of_get_cpu_state_node - Get CPU's idle state node at the given index
> *
> * @cpu_node: The device node for the CPU
> - * @index: The index in the list of the idle states
> +g* @index: The index in the list of the idle states
Oops!
> *
> * Two generic methods can be used to describe a CPU's idle states, either via
> * a flattened description through the "cpu-idle-states" binding or via the
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 8:07 [PATCH v3 0/7] DT: Enable sharing resources for SMT threads Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] of: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-28 15:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] coresight: cti: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] coresight: " Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] perf/arm-dsu: refactor cpu id retrieval via new API of_cpu_phandle_to_id Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: of: handle multiple threads in ARM cpu node Alireza Sanaee
2025-05-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] of: of_cpu_phandle_to_id to support SMT threads Alireza Sanaee
2025-06-06 14:18 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250606141857.GA1476878-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).