Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Yuzhuo Jing <yuzhuo@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] vdso: Switch get/put unaligned from packed struct to memcpy
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:32:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250617063236.GI8289@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c57de5bf-d55c-48c5-9dfa-e2fb844dafe9@csgroup.eu>

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 07:22:57AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 17/06/2025 à 02:57, Ian Rogers a écrit :
> > Type punning is necessary for get/put unaligned but the use of a
> > packed struct violates strict aliasing rules, requiring
> > -fno-strict-aliasing to be passed to the C compiler. Switch to using
> > memcpy so that -fno-strict-aliasing isn't necessary.
> 
> VDSO build fails with this patch:
> 
>   VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not
> supported
> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1
> 
> Behind the relocation issue, calling memcpy() for a single 4-bytes word
> kills performance.

memcpy() does normally do the right thing for unaligned accesses of 1, 2, 4, or
8-byte values.  The snag here seems to be that the VDSO is built with
-fno-builtin (and -ffreestanding which implies -fno-builtin).  That causes the
compiler to no longer optimize out the calls to memcpy().  If __builtin_memcpy()
is used instead of memcpy(), it does work and generates the same code as before.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17  0:57 [PATCH v1 0/3] Switch get/put unaligned to use memcpy Ian Rogers
2025-06-17  0:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] vdso: Switch get/put unaligned from packed struct to memcpy Ian Rogers
2025-06-17  5:22   ` Christophe Leroy
2025-06-17  6:32     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-06-17  9:13       ` Christophe Leroy
2025-06-17 17:21   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-17 18:55   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-17  0:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] tools headers: Update the linux/unaligned.h copy with the kernel sources Ian Rogers
2025-06-17  0:58 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] tools headers: Remove unneeded ignoring of warnings in unaligned.h Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250617063236.GI8289@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yuzhuo@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox