From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Cc: <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<coresight@lists.linaro.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<dianders@chromium.org>, <james.clark@linaro.org>,
<krzk@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<mike.leach@linaro.org>, <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
<saravanak@google.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] coresight: cti: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 09:36:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708093623.0000363e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707150414.620-4-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 16:04:12 +0100
Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> wrote:
> Use the newly created API to grab CPU id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Here is the justification for allowing the node parameter to be null.
> ---
> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 15 +++------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
> index d0ae10bf6128..cd821e926792 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
> @@ -41,21 +41,12 @@
> */
> static int of_cti_get_cpu_at_node(const struct device_node *node)
> {
> + struct device_node *dn = NULL;
> int cpu;
> - struct device_node *dn;
>
> - if (node == NULL)
> - return -1;
> -
> - dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
> - /* CTI affinity defaults to no cpu */
> - if (!dn)
> - return -1;
> - cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(dn);
> + cpu = of_cpu_phandle_to_id(node, &dn, 0);
> of_node_put(dn);
With change suggested on patch 1 this becomes
static int of_cti_get_cpu_at_node(const struct device_node *node)
{
int cpu = of_cpu_phandle_to_id(node, NULL, 0);
return (cpu < 0) ? -1 : cpu;
}
> -
> - /* No Affinity if no cpu nodes are found */
> - return (cpu < 0) ? -1 : cpu;
> + return cpu;
This an result in -ENODEV hence juggle above. No idea
why the caller will care but I guess it does or this code
would not be here!
> }
>
> #else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 15:04 [PATCH 0/5] Refactoring finding CPU phandles in DT Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] of: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-08 8:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-08 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-08 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] coresight: cti: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:36 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] coresight: " Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf/arm-dsu: refactor cpu id retrieval via new API of_cpu_phandle_to_id Alireza Sanaee
2025-07-08 8:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250708093623.0000363e@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).