From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Clément Le Goffic" <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Gatien Chevallier" <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Gabriel Fernandez" <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>,
"Le Goffic" <legoffic.clement@gmail.com>,
"Julius Werner" <jwerner@chromium.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
"Clément Le Goffic" <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:43:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396@foss.st.com>
Hi Clément,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cl-ment-Le-Goffic/bus-firewall-move-stm32_firewall-header-file-in-include-folder/20250728-234144
base: 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver
config: s390-randconfig-001-20250730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:213:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
213 | writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:220:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
220 | writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:227:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
227 | writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:234:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
234 | writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg);
| ^
>> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:240:15: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
240 | u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:255:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
255 | u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:258:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
258 | writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:264:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
264 | u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:267:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
267 | writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:285:17: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
285 | cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:288:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
288 | writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:302:16: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
302 | cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:306:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
306 | writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:428:9: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
428 | val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->counter_evt[counter->idx].reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:778:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
778 | writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg);
| ^
drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:803:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
803 | writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg);
| ^
16 errors generated.
vim +/writel_relaxed +213 drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c
208
209 static void stm32_ddr_start_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu)
210 {
211 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
212
> 213 writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg);
214 }
215
216 static void stm32_ddr_stop_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu)
217 {
218 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
219
220 writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg);
221 }
222
223 static void stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu)
224 {
225 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
226
227 writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg);
228 }
229
230 static void stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter)
231 {
232 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
233
234 writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg);
235 }
236
237 static void stm32_ddr_clear_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter)
238 {
239 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
> 240 u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg);
241
242 if (counter->idx == pmu->cfg->time_cnt_idx)
243 stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(pmu);
244 else
245 stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(pmu, counter);
246
247 if (status & r->status.mask)
248 dev_err(pmu->dev, "Failed to clear counter %i because the PMU is busy\n",
249 counter->idx);
250 }
251
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-30 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 15:29 [PATCH v5 00/20] Introduce STM32 DDR PMU for STM32MP platforms Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] bus: firewall: move stm32_firewall header file in include folder Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] dt-bindings: stm32: stm32mp25: add `#access-controller-cells` property Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:50 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] clk: stm32mp25: add firewall grant_access ops Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] arm64: dts: st: set rcc as an access-controller Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR props into SDRAM props Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 18:27 ` Julius Werner
2025-08-14 14:06 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: introduce DDR4 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 18:29 ` Julius Werner
2025-08-14 14:40 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 21:11 ` Rob Herring
2025-08-14 14:42 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-08-17 7:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-22 13:59 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR channel binding into SDRAM channel Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:52 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] dt-binding: memory: add DDR4 channel compatible Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:52 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] dt-bindings: memory: SDRAM channel: standardise node name Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:53 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] arm64: dts: st: add LPDDR channel to stm32mp257f-dk board Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] arm64: dts: st: add DDR channel to stm32mp257f-ev1 board Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] dt-bindings: perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM dt-bindings Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:54 ` Rob Herring
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 14:43 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] Documentation: perf: stm32: add ddrperfm support Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] MAINTAINERS: add myself as STM32 DDR PMU maintainer Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] ARM: dts: stm32: add ddrperfm on stm32mp131 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] ARM: dts: stm32: add ddrperfm on stm32mp151 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] arm64: dts: st: add ddrperfm on stm32mp251 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] arm64: dts: st: support ddrperfm on stm32mp257f-dk Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] arm64: dts: st: support ddrperfm on stm32mp257f-ev1 Clément Le Goffic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=clement.legoffic@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com \
--cc=gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=legoffic.clement@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).