From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v7 10/12] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 09:34:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250828013435.1528459-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828013435.1528459-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
arch-PEBS provides CPUIDs to enumerate which counters support PEBS
sampling and precise distribution PEBS sampling. Thus PEBS constraints
should be dynamically configured base on these counter and precise
distribution bitmap instead of defining them statically.
Update event dyn_constraint base on PEBS event precise level.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 41c4af6bd62c..818c197585c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4252,6 +4252,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
}
if (event->attr.precise_ip) {
+ struct arch_pebs_cap pebs_cap = hybrid(event->pmu, arch_pebs_cap);
+
if ((event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == INTEL_FIXED_VLBR_EVENT)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -4265,6 +4267,15 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
}
if (x86_pmu.pebs_aliases)
x86_pmu.pebs_aliases(event);
+
+ if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs) {
+ u64 cntr_mask = hybrid(event->pmu, intel_ctrl) &
+ ~GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
+ u64 pebs_mask = event->attr.precise_ip >= 3 ?
+ pebs_cap.pdists : pebs_cap.counters;
+ if (cntr_mask != pebs_mask)
+ event->hw.dyn_constraint &= pebs_mask;
+ }
}
if (needs_branch_stack(event)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index ed9bce51182d..4217d0a5d584 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -3022,6 +3022,7 @@ static void __init intel_arch_pebs_init(void)
x86_pmu.pebs_buffer_size = PEBS_BUFFER_SIZE;
x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs;
x86_pmu.pebs_capable = ~0ULL;
+ x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL;
x86_pmu.pebs_enable = __intel_pmu_pebs_enable;
x86_pmu.pebs_disable = __intel_pmu_pebs_disable;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 1:34 [Patch v7 00/12] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 01/12] perf/x86: Remove redundant is_x86_event() prototype Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 02/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Replace x86_pmu.drain_pebs calling with static call Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 04/12] perf/x86/intel: Correct large PEBS flag check Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 05/12] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 06/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS record processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 07/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS group " Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 09/12] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 11/12] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250828013435.1528459-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).