linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/12] arm64/boot: Factor out a macro to check SPE version
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 11:05:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250901100558.GJ745921@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814-james-perf-feat_spe_eft-v7-5-6a743f7fa259@linaro.org>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:25:27AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> We check the version of SPE twice, and we'll add one more check in the
> next commit so factor out a macro to do this. Change the #3 magic number
> to the actual SPE version define (V1p2) to make it more readable.
> 
> No functional changes intended.
> 
> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index 46033027510c..3a4ca7f9acfb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -103,8 +103,7 @@
>  	csel	x2, xzr, x0, eq			// all PMU counters from EL1
>  
>  	/* Statistical profiling */
> -	ubfx	x0, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, #4
> -	cbz	x0, .Lskip_spe_\@		// Skip if SPE not present
> +	__spe_vers_imp .Lskip_spe_\@, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP, x0 // Skip if SPE not present
>  
>  	mrs_s	x0, SYS_PMBIDR_EL1              // If SPE available at EL2,
>  	and	x0, x0, #(1 << PMBIDR_EL1_P_SHIFT)
> @@ -255,6 +254,14 @@
>  .Lskip_brbe_\@:
>  .endm
>  
> +/* Branch to skip_label if SPE version is less than given version */
> +.macro __spe_vers_imp skip_label, version, tmp
> +    mrs    \tmp, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> +    ubfx   \tmp, \tmp, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, #4
> +    cmp    \tmp, \version
> +    b.lt   \skip_label
> +.endm
> +

Just wondering if we need to move the macro to the beginning of the
file, so that we can define it first and call it afterwards.

Otherwise, LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>

>  /* Disable any fine grained traps */
>  .macro __init_el2_fgt
>  	mrs	x1, id_aa64mmfr0_el1
> @@ -263,10 +270,8 @@
>  
>  	mov	x0, xzr
>  	mov	x2, xzr
> -	mrs	x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> -	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, #4
> -	cmp	x1, #3
> -	b.lt	.Lskip_spe_fgt_\@
> +	/* If SPEv1p2 is implemented, */
> +	__spe_vers_imp .Lskip_spe_fgt_\@, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_V1P2, x1
>  	/* Disable PMSNEVFR_EL1 read and write traps */
>  	orr	x0, x0, #HDFGRTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK
>  	orr	x2, x2, #HDFGWTR_EL2_nPMSNEVFR_EL1_MASK
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-01 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-14  9:25 [PATCH v7 00/12] perf: arm_spe: Armv8.8 SPE features James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] arm64: sysreg: Add new PMSFCR_EL1 fields and PMSDSFR_EL1 register James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] perf: arm_spe: Support FEAT_SPEv1p4 filters James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] perf: arm_spe: Expose event filter James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] perf: arm_spe: Add support for FEAT_SPE_EFT extended filtering James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] arm64/boot: Factor out a macro to check SPE version James Clark
2025-09-01 10:05   ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-09-01 12:22     ` James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for SPE_FEAT_FDS James Clark
2025-09-01 10:19   ` Leo Yan
2025-09-01 12:21     ` James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: Add trap configs for PMSDSFR_EL1 James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] perf: Add perf_event_attr::config4 James Clark
2025-08-18 15:51   ` Ian Rogers
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] perf: arm_spe: Add support for filtering on data source James Clark
2025-09-01 10:27   ` Leo Yan
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] tools headers UAPI: Sync linux/perf_event.h with the kernel sources James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] perf tools: Add support for perf_event_attr::config4 James Clark
2025-08-14  9:25 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] perf docs: arm-spe: Document new SPE filtering features James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250901100558.GJ745921@e132581.arm.com \
    --to=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).