From: Jakub Brnak <jbrnak@redhat.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, mpetlan@redhat.com,
vmolnaro@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce structure for shell tests
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:56:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251125155648.197527-1-jbrnak@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi maintainers,
This revision of series of patches continues the effort of upstreaming a perftool-testsuite and
incorporates the review feedback that was previously discussed.
A new patch (7/7) was added to fix the incorrect relative path for locating stderr-whitelist.txt
in report tests.
Thanks,
Jakub
Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250930160923.13728-1-jbrnak@redhat.com/#t
Changes since v4:
Patch 1: applied review feedback, renamed shell_info -> shell_test_info, minor cleanups
Patch 2: renamed shell_info -> shell_test_info
Patch 4: renamed shell_info -> shell_test_info
Patch 7: added in v5, fix for relative path to
stderr-whitelist.txt in report tests
Jakub Brnak (7):
perf tests: Create a structure for shell tests
perf test: Provide setup for the shell test suite
perftool-testsuite: Add empty setup for base_probe
perf test: Introduce storing logs for shell tests
perf test: Format log directories for shell tests
perf test: Remove perftool drivers
perf test: Fix relative path for 'stderr-whitelist.txt'
tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 129 +++++++-
tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/setup.sh | 13 +
.../tests/shell/base_report/test_basic.sh | 6 +-
.../tests/shell/perftool-testsuite_probe.sh | 24 --
.../tests/shell/perftool-testsuite_report.sh | 23 --
tools/perf/tests/tests-scripts.c | 288 +++++++++++++++---
tools/perf/tests/tests-scripts.h | 15 +
tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 8 +-
8 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/setup.sh
delete mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/perftool-testsuite_probe.sh
delete mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/perftool-testsuite_report.sh
--
2.51.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 15:56 Jakub Brnak [this message]
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] perf tests: Create a structure for shell tests Jakub Brnak
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] perf test: Provide setup for the shell test suite Jakub Brnak
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] perftool-testsuite: Add empty setup for base_probe Jakub Brnak
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] perf test: Introduce storing logs for shell tests Jakub Brnak
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] perf test: Format log directories " Jakub Brnak
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] perf test: Remove perftool drivers Jakub Brnak
2025-11-25 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] perf test: Fix relative path for 'stderr-whitelist.txt' Jakub Brnak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251125155648.197527-1-jbrnak@redhat.com \
--to=jbrnak@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).