Re: [PATCH Linux-next] perf test: Fix test case perf trace BTF general tests

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:13:00 +0100
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> >> I haven't tried it without the patches. Does it usually show what "buf" is?
> >> Now with the reading of user space, it can show the content too!  
> > 
> > Yep, it reads the content using BPF.  This is on my 6.16 kernel.
> > 
> >   $ sudo perf trace -e write -- /bin/echo hello
> >   hello
> >        0.000 ( 0.014 ms): echo/61922 write(fd: 1, buf: hello\10, count: 6)                                 = 6
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> > 
> >   
> 
> Hello Namhyung, Steven,
> 
> friendly ping... any progress here?
> 

I honestly have no clue how to fix this, as I don't even know where to
look. Is it BPF that is messing up? If so, where's the BPF program that is
doing this.

I thought BPF is supposed to handle updates and should never cause API
breakage?

I'll continue to look at the builtin-trace.c, but it seems that the BPF
program it's attached to is handing it garbage with:

	perf trace -e syscalls:sys_enter_write

The new fields are at the end. The BPF program should simply ignore those
values. But again, I don't know where this BPF program lives.

-- Steve