From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E33E2DD608; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 08:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765183834; cv=none; b=uyryhW0Soq0lnd8VopgAA69CNEkNnxk6BsG4b6w42hTrkQ9fLImUyFHdZ0W+vPPXyhIbo6vn06dZR7HJqWUGeCz/Wq5EMAxAUsYGkL9NX1ry/t7M1sv4TcmvBfZFytekqJ9MCkBLMrcDIZOo+ZJSKh2fLyCGd18gdwikAY6ddDU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765183834; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gP9IZub1CXFwc8U+XH0DbSLtta3vvhcnMY1BjJzMxc4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gw1G8xYXP6ui75Z41swdPGXfFaAH0QvEDwYsBIUb7Hlq8uyAg5Q3w7OLba9o9dByB5YFy9YRmRoV1lfVae2Zz36xzM1ZmsLVbCyrWjol8e9NcXB+SCQDIaA9YQQRfALrawUElJ5hjOWeiVbrgjtLFcO/DVQ+4M805WfhMzbXSPI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=YrQAqzWJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="YrQAqzWJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=za4eJfAzfcigSmbD2HxrnUJ9fQifoichO9AYM9rALrE=; b=YrQAqzWJJSk5v/6k67tUAr1Zzf 2xURg4yRkL+7ONvyuY3rMk1wk8aUbmQqxpWv3hlb2TXB93RAbZ6r7JN58014KqXCpxKml0//SxXTY RZhPOR0TC18m6Kc3QSHFozU/lz42BWWBCCvyvwT7iM+9gy4cp0lKbs4REIEpK1YSBu0x/kFWKyie1 1ah9l/qnB9X69DYJJMGd7p3kCDjFAUG6VLw9GEVHLE8kNI1EU5mFPwmQbbpAEo/0viwLmYWNi7Gvh g2Gp2otsyXbPKenfke2hsomjpjH879yrbWCN5yg5jMGP2QTLvu9pJ9ZJ026YADLhWt6Uf9CJozrWP eGaeYs+Q==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vSWwn-00000009YKT-2ETq; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:50:21 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80E7B30301A; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 09:50:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:50:20 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Mi, Dapeng" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , Eranian Stephane , Mark Rutland , broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Zide Chen , Falcon Thomas , Dapeng Mi , Xudong Hao Subject: Re: [Patch v5 16/19] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Message-ID: <20251208085020.GA3707891@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20251203065500.2597594-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> <20251203065500.2597594-17-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> <20251205123940.GY2528459@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5e808ff0-0107-4085-a1ab-ea1cfed4e0ca@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5e808ff0-0107-4085-a1ab-ea1cfed4e0ca@linux.intel.com> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 02:46:44PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote: > This change only take effects for arch-PEBS. For the legacy PEBS, the > "handled" would still be added 1 unconditionally even the *_drain_pebs() > helpers always return 0. > >     /* >      * PEBS overflow sets bit 62 in the global status register >      */ >     if (__test_and_clear_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF_BIT, (unsigned long > *)&status)) { >         u64 pebs_enabled = cpuc->pebs_enabled; > >         handled++; >         x86_pmu_handle_guest_pebs(regs, &data); >         static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data); > Oh gawd. Please don't do that. If you change the calling convention of that function, please have it be used consistently.