From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Tamas Petz <tamas.petz@arm.com>,
Tamas Zsoldos <tamas.zsoldos@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor status clearing
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 15:29:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251209152906.GW724103@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb3b495a-3e04-417f-a674-e1753fd85177@arm.com>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 06:27:27PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 01/12/25 4:51 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> > If the driver does not clear the status when disabling the trace buffer
> > unit, stale state will carry over to the next enable, though the driver
> > clears it again on enable.
>
> There is no problem now ! Because trbe_enable_hw() calls clr_trbe_status().
>
> >
> > Explicitly clear status after the trace is disabled in the interrupt
> > handling and when a perf session ends. Keep the status for spurious
> > interrupts for continuous tracing.
>
> But is not that the behaviour already without this change ?
>
> clr_trbe_status() in trbe_enable_hw() ensures that no TRBE session can be
> started without first clearing the existing status. Still wondering what
> is the purpose of this change ?
It is about the driver's sanity.
The driver should clear the status immediately when the trace unit is
disabled, rather than waiting until the next enable. This avoids
unexpected behaviour, such as a spurious TRBE interrupt.
Consider an edge case: if TRBE is being disabled at the same moment it
is about to raise an interrupt, arm_trbe_update_buffer() may miss the
IRQ bit due to latency. If arm_trbe_disable() does not clear that bit,
arm_trbe_irq_handler() will still run after the perf event has been
stopped. The interrupt handler then retrieves the trbe_buf pointer
from the perf output handle, which is dangerous because the perf
session has already ended.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 11:21 [PATCH 00/19] coresight: trbe: Support trigger and circle buffer modes Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 01/19] coresight: trbe: Use helpers for checking errata Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:08 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 02/19] coresight: trbe: Remove redundant disable operation Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:25 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 03/19] coresight: trbe: Remove buffer disabling in trbe_handle_overflow() Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:31 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 04/19] coresight: trbe: Remove set_trbe_disabled() from the enable flow Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 13:25 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 05/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor status clearing Leo Yan
2025-12-04 12:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 15:29 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 06/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor syndrome decoding Leo Yan
2025-12-02 11:06 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-02 14:24 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-09 13:17 ` James Clark
2025-12-09 16:06 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-05 4:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 15:57 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 07/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor AUX flag setting Leo Yan
2025-12-02 11:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-02 14:21 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-09 13:37 ` James Clark
2025-12-10 15:43 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-12 14:50 ` James Clark
2025-12-12 15:27 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-12 15:52 ` James Clark
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 08/19] coresight: trbe: Use PERF_AUX_FLAG_PARTIAL instead of PERF_AUX_FLAG_COLLISION Leo Yan
2025-12-05 4:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 13:40 ` James Clark
2025-12-10 16:19 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:21 ` [PATCH 09/19] coresight: trbe: Add fault action argument to trbe_handle_overflow() Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 10/19] coresight: trbe: Always check fault action when updating buffer Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:00 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 11/19] coresight: trbe: Apply overwrite erratum for only wrap event Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-02 16:56 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 17:12 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 12/19] coresight: trbe: Calculate size for buffer wrapping Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 13/19] coresight: trbe: Remove misleading comment Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 14/19] coresight: trbe: Refactor compute_trbe_buffer_limit() Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 15/19] coresight: trbe: Add static key for bypassing trigger mode Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 16/19] coresight: trbe: Support " Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 17/19] coresight: trbe: Enable circle mode for snapshot Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 18/19] coresight: trbe: Add kunit tests Leo Yan
2025-12-01 11:22 ` [PATCH 19/19] perf: cs-etm: Set watermark for AUX trace Leo Yan
2025-12-05 4:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-09 14:54 ` James Clark
2025-12-10 2:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-05 4:53 ` [PATCH 00/19] coresight: trbe: Support trigger and circle buffer modes Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251209152906.GW724103@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tamas.petz@arm.com \
--cc=tamas.zsoldos@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).